QCGDX vs. KAMIX
QCGDX (Quantified Common Ground Fund) and KAMIX (Kensington Managed Income Fund) are both mutual funds - QCGDX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Advisors Preferred, while KAMIX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by Advisors Preferred. Over the past 3 years, QCGDX returned 12.35%/yr vs 5.28%/yr for KAMIX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QCGDX charges 1.68%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for KAMIX.
Performance
QCGDX vs. KAMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCGDX achieves a 16.91% return, which is significantly higher than KAMIX's 1.93% return.
QCGDX
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 16.91%
- 6M
- 16.47%
- 1Y
- 23.38%
- 3Y*
- 12.35%
- 5Y*
- 9.77%
- 10Y*
- —
KAMIX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 6.55%
- 3Y*
- 5.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCGDX vs. KAMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCGDX Quantified Common Ground Fund | 16.91% | 1.02% | 9.87% | 14.74% | -8.74% |
KAMIX Kensington Managed Income Fund | 1.93% | 4.32% | 4.38% | 3.96% | -2.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between QCGDX and KAMIX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2022 | 0.47 |
The correlation between QCGDX and KAMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QCGDX vs. KAMIX — Risk / Return Rank
QCGDX
KAMIX
QCGDX vs. KAMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) and Kensington Managed Income Fund (KAMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QCGDX | KAMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.44 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | 2.66 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.33 | 11.98 | +1.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QCGDX vs. KAMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCGDX drawdown since its inception was -22.37%, which is greater than KAMIX's maximum drawdown of -6.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCGDX and KAMIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QCGDX | KAMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.37% | -6.11% | -16.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.92% | -2.55% | -5.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.10% | -4.35% | -11.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -0.10% | -1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.11% | -2.13% | -3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 0.57% | +1.19% |
Volatility
QCGDX vs. KAMIX - Volatility Comparison
Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to Kensington Managed Income Fund (KAMIX) at 1.09%. This indicates that QCGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KAMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QCGDX | KAMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.35% | 1.09% | +6.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 2.57% | +8.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.56% | 3.16% | +10.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 3.81% | +11.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 3.81% | +12.81% |
QCGDX vs. KAMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCGDX has a 1.68% expense ratio, which is higher than KAMIX's 1.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
QCGDX vs. KAMIX - Dividend Comparison
QCGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than KAMIX's 5.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KAMIX Kensington Managed Income Fund | 5.59% | 4.57% | 5.60% | 4.15% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QCGDX Quantified Common Ground Fund | 0.59% | 0.69% | 4.42% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 5.44% | 1.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QCGDX and KAMIX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCGDX has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to KAMIX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QCGDX dropped -22.37% vs KAMIX's -6.11%.
KAMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QCGDX and KAMIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer