MVALX vs. FSMD
MVALX (Meridian Contrarian Fund) and FSMD (Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF) are both funds - MVALX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Meridian, while FSMD is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index. Over the past 5 years, MVALX returned 8.90%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for FSMD. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MVALX charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FSMD.
Performance
MVALX vs. FSMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVALX achieves a 16.89% return, which is significantly lower than FSMD's 18.77% return.
MVALX
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- 4.25%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 6M
- 14.57%
- 1Y
- 32.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
FSMD
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 5.08%
- YTD
- 18.77%
- 6M
- 16.11%
- 1Y
- 30.47%
- 3Y*
- 18.87%
- 5Y*
- 10.79%
- 10Y*
- —
MVALX vs. FSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVALX Meridian Contrarian Fund | 16.89% | 17.43% | 9.73% | 12.40% | -16.67% | 26.66% | 23.75% | 7.91% |
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 18.77% | 8.70% | 15.18% | 17.37% | -11.15% | 26.40% | 8.94% | 8.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVALX and FSMD is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between MVALX and FSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVALX vs. FSMD — Risk / Return Rank
MVALX
FSMD
MVALX vs. FSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meridian Contrarian Fund (MVALX) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MVALX | FSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.34 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 3.63 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.24 | 13.05 | -2.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MVALX vs. FSMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVALX drawdown since its inception was -50.65%, which is greater than FSMD's maximum drawdown of -40.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVALX and FSMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVALX | FSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.65% | -40.67% | -9.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.53% | -8.44% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.80% | -22.16% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.80% | -22.16% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | 0.00% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.11% | -5.97% | -1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 2.34% | +0.93% |
Volatility
MVALX vs. FSMD - Volatility Comparison
Meridian Contrarian Fund (MVALX) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) at 4.86%. This indicates that MVALX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVALX | FSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 4.86% | +2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.27% | 11.92% | +3.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.77% | 15.73% | +4.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 18.53% | +2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.50% | 21.41% | +0.09% |
MVALX vs. FSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVALX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
MVALX vs. FSMD - Dividend Comparison
MVALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.96%, more than FSMD's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 1.22% | 1.33% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 1.54% | 1.18% | 1.32% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MVALX Meridian Contrarian Fund | 10.96% | 12.81% | 4.26% | 5.45% | 11.45% | 14.16% | 4.93% | 7.94% | 25.52% | 10.53% | 0.52% | 16.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MVALX and FSMD have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MVALX has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to FSMD (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVALX dropped -50.65% vs FSMD's -40.67%.
FSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MVALX and FSMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer