PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MVALX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MVALX and FBGRX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

MVALX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meridian Contrarian Fund (MVALX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.02%
10.07%
MVALX
FBGRX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MVALX:

0.57

FBGRX:

1.29

Sortino Ratio

MVALX:

0.87

FBGRX:

1.76

Omega Ratio

MVALX:

1.11

FBGRX:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

MVALX:

0.27

FBGRX:

1.78

Martin Ratio

MVALX:

1.91

FBGRX:

5.38

Ulcer Index

MVALX:

4.82%

FBGRX:

4.99%

Daily Std Dev

MVALX:

16.22%

FBGRX:

20.85%

Max Drawdown

MVALX:

-62.36%

FBGRX:

-55.96%

Current Drawdown

MVALX:

-25.57%

FBGRX:

-0.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVALX achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 4.25% return. Over the past 10 years, MVALX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 0.33%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.48% annualized return.


MVALX

YTD

2.50%

1M

1.71%

6M

4.02%

1Y

6.92%

5Y*

2.36%

10Y*

0.33%

FBGRX

YTD

4.25%

1M

2.91%

6M

10.07%

1Y

24.31%

5Y*

14.88%

10Y*

13.48%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MVALX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVALX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


MVALX
Meridian Contrarian Fund
Expense ratio chart for MVALX: current value at 1.12% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.12%
Expense ratio chart for FBGRX: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MVALX vs. FBGRX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVALX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MVALX is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MVALX is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MVALX is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MVALX is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MVALX is 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MVALX is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBGRX is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MVALX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meridian Contrarian Fund (MVALX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MVALX, currently valued at 0.57, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.000.571.29
The chart of Sortino ratio for MVALX, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.871.76
The chart of Omega ratio for MVALX, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.111.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for MVALX, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.271.78
The chart of Martin ratio for MVALX, currently valued at 1.91, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.001.915.38
MVALX
FBGRX

The current MVALX Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVALX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.57
1.29
MVALX
FBGRX

Dividends

MVALX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

MVALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than FBGRX's 0.22% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MVALX
Meridian Contrarian Fund
0.48%0.49%0.46%0.00%0.00%2.25%0.89%1.58%0.01%0.03%0.07%0.22%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
0.22%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.09%0.22%5.07%6.08%

Drawdowns

MVALX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVALX drawdown since its inception was -62.36%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -55.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVALX and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-25.57%
-0.64%
MVALX
FBGRX

Volatility

MVALX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Meridian Contrarian Fund (MVALX) is 4.68%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that MVALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.68%
6.43%
MVALX
FBGRX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab