PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVALX vs. MERDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVALX vs. MERDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meridian Contrarian Fund (MVALX) and Meridian Growth Fund (MERDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVALX achieves a 17.57% return, which is significantly higher than MERDX's 5.24% return. Over the past 10 years, MVALX has outperformed MERDX with an annualized return of 13.55%, while MERDX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.17% annualized return.


MVALX

1D
1.96%
1M
6.59%
YTD
17.57%
6M
18.16%
1Y
35.80%
3Y*
16.74%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
13.55%

MERDX

1D
-0.18%
1M
3.69%
YTD
5.24%
6M
4.56%
1Y
5.46%
3Y*
2.79%
5Y*
-2.22%
10Y*
7.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVALX vs. MERDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MVALX
Meridian Contrarian Fund
17.57%17.43%9.73%12.40%-16.67%26.66%23.75%23.66%-7.85%24.88%
MERDX
Meridian Growth Fund
5.24%-6.25%6.42%15.29%-29.13%15.58%24.93%27.67%-7.30%25.64%

Correlation

The correlation between MVALX and MERDX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 1994

0.88

The correlation between MVALX and MERDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVALX vs. MERDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVALX
MVALX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MVALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVALX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MVALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVALX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

MERDX
MERDX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MERDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MERDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MERDX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MERDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MERDX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVALX vs. MERDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meridian Contrarian Fund (MVALX) and Meridian Growth Fund (MERDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVALXMERDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.08

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

0.49

+2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.18

1.32

+10.86

MVALX vs. MERDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVALX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the MERDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVALX and MERDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVALXMERDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

0.41

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

-0.11

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.34

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.45

+0.15

Drawdowns

MVALX vs. MERDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVALX drawdown since its inception was -50.65%, roughly equal to the maximum MERDX drawdown of -48.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVALX and MERDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVALXMERDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.65%

-48.45%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.53%

-14.50%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.80%

-24.32%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.80%

-37.93%

+13.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.06%

-40.64%

-1.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-20.79%

+20.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-10.28%

+3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

5.31%

-2.09%

Volatility

MVALX vs. MERDX - Volatility Comparison

Meridian Contrarian Fund (MVALX) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to Meridian Growth Fund (MERDX) at 4.31%. This indicates that MVALX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MERDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVALXMERDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

4.31%

+2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.51%

12.09%

+2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.25%

17.34%

+1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.74%

21.44%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.44%

21.32%

+0.12%

MVALX vs. MERDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVALX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than MERDX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

MVALX vs. MERDX - Dividend Comparison

MVALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.90%, more than MERDX's 8.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MERDX
Meridian Growth Fund
8.58%9.03%0.24%0.00%13.80%15.49%0.88%9.15%16.44%7.07%0.57%12.17%
MVALX
Meridian Contrarian Fund
10.90%12.81%4.26%5.45%11.45%14.16%4.93%7.94%25.52%10.53%0.52%16.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


MVALX and MERDX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MVALX has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to MERDX (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVALX dropped -50.65% vs MERDX's -48.45%.

MVALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVALX and MERDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer