MERDX vs. FCNTX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MERDX (Meridian Growth Fund) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both mutual funds - MERDX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Meridian, while FCNTX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, MERDX returned 7.26%/yr vs 17.96%/yr for FCNTX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MERDX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.

Performance

MERDX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meridian Growth Fund (MERDX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MERDX achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 10.97% return. Over the past 10 years, MERDX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 7.26%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.96% annualized return.

MERDX

• 1D: 2.31%
• 1M: 2.47%
• YTD: 6.33%
• 6M: 3.49%
• 1Y: 7.11%
• 3Y*: 2.58%
• 5Y*: -2.06%
• 10Y*: 7.26%

FCNTX

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 4.18%
• YTD: 10.97%
• 6M: 10.79%
• 1Y: 26.78%
• 3Y*: 27.28%
• 5Y*: 15.45%
• 10Y*: 17.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MERDX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MERDX Meridian Growth Fund	6.33%	-6.25%	6.42%	15.29%	-29.13%	15.58%	24.93%	27.67%	-7.30%	25.64%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	10.97%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	30.00%	-3.81%	32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MERDX and FCNTX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 1984	0.78

The correlation between MERDX and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MERDX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MERDX

MERDX Risk / Return Rank: 6
MERDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
MERDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
MERDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
MERDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
MERDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 42
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MERDX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meridian Growth Fund (MERDX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MERDX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	1.75	-1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.71	2.41	-1.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.31	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	2.31	-1.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.36	9.69	-8.33

MERDX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MERDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MERDX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MERDX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MERDX drawdown since its inception was -48.45%, roughly equal to the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MERDX and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MERDX	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.45%	-49.19%	+0.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.50%	-11.30%	-3.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.32%	-19.75%	-4.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.93%	-32.59%	-5.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.64%	-32.59%	-8.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.98%	-0.48%	-19.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.29%	-8.15%	-2.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.31%	2.69%	+2.62%

Volatility

MERDX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Meridian Growth Fund (MERDX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) have volatilities of 6.11% and 5.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MERDX	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.11%	5.94%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.96%	11.74%	+1.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.74%	14.92%	+2.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.54%	19.30%	+2.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.36%	19.74%	+1.62%

MERDX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MERDX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

MERDX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

MERDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.49%, more than FCNTX's 4.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.21%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%
MERDX Meridian Growth Fund	8.49%	9.03%	0.24%	0.00%	13.80%	15.49%	0.88%	9.15%	16.44%	7.07%	0.57%	12.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MERDX and FCNTX in my portfolio?

MERDX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MERDX or FCNTX?

MERDX has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to FCNTX (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MERDX dropped -48.45% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.