MVAL vs. COMT
MVAL (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Broad Value Wide Moat Focus Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MVAL returned 17.99% vs 33.46% for COMT. Their -0.12 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MVAL charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
MVAL vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVAL achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 29.49% return.
MVAL
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 7.82%
- 1Y
- 17.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.08%
COMT
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- 6M
- 19.23%
- YTD
- 29.49%
- 1Y
- 33.46%
- 3Y*
- 10.63%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.13M | $10.19M | $11.89M | |
| $8.49K | $10.82K | $24.43K |
MVAL vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MVAL VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF | 7.82% | 14.17% | 6.27% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 29.49% | 6.07% | -0.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVAL and COMT is -0.27, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2024 | -0.12 |
The correlation between MVAL and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVAL vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
MVAL
COMT
MVAL vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MVAL | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.27 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.91 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.22 | 5.84 | -2.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MVAL vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVAL drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVAL and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVAL | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.56% | -51.89% | +32.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.16% | -17.57% | +5.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -11.75% | +10.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.98% | -23.89% | +19.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.60% | 5.75% | -0.15% |
Volatility
MVAL vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) is 4.77%, while iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that MVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVAL | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 5.13% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.52% | 18.95% | -8.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.89% | 21.64% | -7.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 21.09% | -5.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 18.86% | -3.44% |
MVAL vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVAL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
MVAL vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
MVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than COMT's 5.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 5.98% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
MVAL VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF | 1.62% | 1.75% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MVAL and COMT have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to MVAL (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVAL dropped -19.56% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 33.46% vs 17.99% for MVAL. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, MVAL has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 33.46% return vs 17.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MVAL.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.98%, compared with 1.62% for MVAL.
MVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while COMT is Commodities. MVAL tracks Morningstar US Broad Value Wide Moat Focus Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while COMT tracks S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MVAL and 0.48% for COMT.
COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MVAL and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer