PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVAL vs. CBSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVAL vs. CBSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVAL achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than CBSE's 32.18% return.


MVAL

1D
-0.54%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
-2.29%
6M
-2.26%
1Y
13.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CBSE

1D
-0.93%
1M
10.89%
YTD
32.18%
6M
29.85%
1Y
51.66%
3Y*
31.65%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVAL vs. CBSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MVAL
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF
-2.29%14.17%6.10%
CBSE
Clough Select Equity ETF
32.18%19.53%19.79%

Correlation

The correlation between MVAL and CBSE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2024

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVAL vs. CBSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVAL
MVAL Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

CBSE
CBSE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CBSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBSE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CBSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBSE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVAL vs. CBSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVALCBSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.37

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

3.83

-2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.87

11.59

-8.73

MVAL vs. CBSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the CBSE Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVAL and CBSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVALCBSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

2.30

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.80

-0.28

Drawdowns

MVAL vs. CBSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVAL drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum CBSE drawdown of -36.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVAL and CBSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVALCBSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-36.30%

+16.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.16%

-13.57%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.57%

-0.93%

-9.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-12.31%

+8.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.88%

4.47%

+0.41%

Volatility

MVAL vs. CBSE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) is 3.59%, while Clough Select Equity ETF (CBSE) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that MVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVALCBSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

7.80%

-4.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

17.58%

-7.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.73%

22.55%

-8.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.40%

24.06%

-8.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.40%

23.79%

-8.39%

MVAL vs. CBSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVAL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CBSE's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

MVAL vs. CBSE - Dividend Comparison

MVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than CBSE's 0.26% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CBSE
Clough Select Equity ETF
0.26%0.35%0.37%1.50%0.52%
MVAL
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF
1.79%1.75%0.97%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MVAL and CBSE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBSE has higher volatility (7.80%) compared to MVAL (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVAL dropped -19.56% vs CBSE's -36.30%.

On 1-year performance, CBSE leads with 51.66% vs 13.96% for MVAL. On fees, MVAL is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, MVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CBSE has performed better with a 51.66% return vs 13.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MVAL is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CBSE.

MVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.26% for CBSE.

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Clough. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MVAL and 0.85% for CBSE.

CBSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVAL and CBSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer