PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUU vs. NUGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUU vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUU achieves a 961.23% return, which is significantly higher than NUGT's -16.05% return.


MUU

1D
3.08%
1M
218.90%
YTD
961.23%
6M
1,422.01%
1Y
6,522.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NUGT

1D
-6.64%
1M
-4.13%
YTD
-16.05%
6M
-6.29%
1Y
97.46%
3Y*
60.96%
5Y*
16.32%
10Y*
-8.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUU vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
961.23%599.03%-43.09%
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares
-16.05%425.05%-28.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MUU and NUGT is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUU vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUU
MUU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

NUGT
NUGT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
NUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUU vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUUNUGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+49.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.91

1.23

+0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

125.85

1.83

+124.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

426.84

4.18

+422.65

MUU vs. NUGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUU Sharpe Ratio is 50.40, which is higher than the NUGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUU and NUGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUUNUGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.40

1.09

+49.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.68

-0.33

+7.02

Drawdowns

MUU vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUU drawdown since its inception was -75.07%, smaller than the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUU and NUGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUUNUGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.07%

-99.97%

+24.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.72%

-53.58%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-99.80%

+99.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.44%

-91.52%

+68.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.51%

23.39%

-7.88%

Volatility

MUU vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a higher volatility of 54.78% compared to Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT) at 30.32%. This indicates that MUU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUUNUGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

54.78%

30.32%

+24.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

105.07%

75.18%

+29.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

131.77%

90.01%

+41.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

133.67%

71.96%

+61.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

133.67%

87.90%

+45.77%

MUU vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUU vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison

MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than NUGT's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
0.46%4.27%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares
0.36%0.22%1.79%1.67%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.63%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUU and NUGT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUU has higher volatility (54.78%) compared to NUGT (30.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUU dropped -75.07% vs NUGT's -99.97%.

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 6522.95% vs 97.46% for NUGT. On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, NUGT has been the lower-risk option at 30.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 6522.95% return vs 97.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MUU is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for NUGT.

MUU has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.36% for NUGT.

Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MUU and 1.23% for NUGT.

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (50.40 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUU and NUGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer