MUU vs. NUGT
MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) and NUGT (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily), while NUGT is a Gold fund tracking the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MUU charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for NUGT.
Performance
MUU vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MUU
- 1D
- -26.28%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUGT
- 1D
- -9.53%
- 1M
- -19.60%
- YTD
- -32.09%
- 6M
- -39.03%
- 1Y
- 60.88%
- 3Y*
- 55.65%
- 5Y*
- 17.04%
- 10Y*
- -11.63%
MUU vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.11% |
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | -17.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUU and NUGT is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUU vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NUGT
MUU vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUU | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.96 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUU vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUU drawdown since its inception was -26.28%, smaller than the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUU and NUGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUU | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.28% | -99.97% | +73.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -63.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -63.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -96.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.28% | -99.84% | +73.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -91.53% | +81.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 26.52% | — |
Volatility
MUU vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUU | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 35.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 80.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 295.32% | 94.31% | +201.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 295.32% | 72.94% | +222.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 295.32% | 87.97% | +207.35% |
MUU vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUU has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUU vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison
MUU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NUGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | 0.44% | 0.22% | 1.79% | 1.67% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUU and NUGT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for NUGT.
NUGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for MUU.
MUU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NUGT is Gold. MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily), while NUGT tracks MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 1.01% for MUU and 1.13% for NUGT.
Find the right allocation for MUU and NUGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer