MUU vs. LINT

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. MUU is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MUU charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

MUU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUU achieves a 449.17% return, which is significantly higher than LINT's 332.54% return.

MUU

• 1D: -12.02%
• 1M: -37.86%
• 6M: 305.92%
• YTD: 449.17%
• 1Y: 2,599.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LINT

• 1D: -11.97%
• 1M: -36.08%
• 6M: 161.32%
• YTD: 332.54%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	449.17%	46.28%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	332.54%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MUU and LINT is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.58

Return for Risk

MUU vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 98
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MUU	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	17.30	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.00	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	47.69	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	152.81	—	—

Drawdowns

MUU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUU drawdown since its inception was -75.07%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -55.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUU and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUU	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.07%	-55.39%	-19.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.25%	-55.39%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.62%	-21.52%	-2.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.31%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MUU	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	62.52%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	125.23%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	152.52%	168.61%	-16.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	142.32%	168.61%	-26.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	142.32%	168.61%	-26.29%

MUU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUU has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

MUU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than LINT's 0.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.63%	0.25%	0.00%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	1.24%	4.27%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUU and LINT in my portfolio?

MUU and LINT have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MUU or LINT?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MUU or LINT?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MUU or LINT?

MUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.63% for LINT.

What is the main difference between MUU and LINT?

Their fees differ too: 1.01% for MUU and 0.97% for LINT.