PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUU vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MUU

1D
-26.28%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
-12.86%
1M
11.99%
YTD
744.89%
6M
773.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MUU and LINT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MUU vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MUU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUU drawdown since its inception was -26.28%, smaller than the maximum LINT drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUU and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUULINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.28%

-49.54%

+23.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.28%

-12.86%

-13.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.19%

-20.48%

+10.29%

Volatility

MUU vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUULINTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

295.32%

168.83%

+126.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

295.32%

168.83%

+126.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

295.32%

168.83%

+126.49%

MUU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUU has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

MUU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, MUU and LINT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for MUU.

Their fees differ too: 1.01% for MUU and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUU and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer