PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUST vs. MMKT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MUST vs. MMKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MUST vs. MMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
0.02%4.92%-1.33%
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
0.84%4.13%1.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUST achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than MMKT's 0.84% return.


MUST

1D
0.34%
1M
-2.40%
YTD
0.02%
6M
1.52%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
2.90%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*

MMKT

1D
0.03%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.84%
6M
1.81%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MUST vs. MMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUST has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than MMKT's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

MUST vs. MMKT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUST
MUST Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MUST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUST Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUST Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MUST Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUST Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

MMKT
MMKT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUST vs. MMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUSTMMKTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

15.67

-14.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.10

51.57

-50.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

12.51

-11.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

93.84

-92.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.26

761.18

-756.92

MUST vs. MMKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUST Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the MMKT Sharpe Ratio of 15.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUST and MMKT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUSTMMKTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

15.67

-14.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

17.44

-16.93

Correlation

The correlation between MUST and MMKT is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

MUST vs. MMKT - Dividend Comparison

MUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than MMKT's 3.85% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MUST
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF
3.29%3.28%3.13%2.51%1.76%1.62%2.33%2.70%0.55%
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
3.85%3.98%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MUST vs. MMKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUST drawdown since its inception was -13.83%, which is greater than MMKT's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUST and MMKT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MUSTMMKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.83%

-0.04%

-13.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.56%

-0.04%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

0.00%

-2.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

0.00%

-3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

0.01%

+1.24%

Volatility

MUST vs. MMKT - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) has a higher volatility of 1.84% compared to Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) at 0.08%. This indicates that MUST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MUSTMMKTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.84%

0.08%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.43%

0.16%

+3.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.60%

0.25%

+6.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.38%

0.24%

+5.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.60%

0.24%

+5.36%