PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUSQ vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUSQ vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUSQ achieves a -8.93% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return.


MUSQ

1D
-2.16%
1M
1.10%
YTD
-8.93%
6M
-6.37%
1Y
-4.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
2.33%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
83.68%
6M
74.95%
1Y
84.41%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUSQ vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MUSQ
MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF
-8.93%19.60%-4.94%1.76%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
83.68%-2.17%2.96%-1.64%

Correlation

The correlation between MUSQ and DBE is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2023

-0.06

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between MUSQ and DBE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.06 to -0.26, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUSQ vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUSQ
MUSQ Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
MUSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MUSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUSQ vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUSQDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.40

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

5.89

-6.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.44

11.53

-11.97

MUSQ vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUSQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUSQ and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUSQDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

2.43

-2.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.09

+0.01

Drawdowns

MUSQ vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUSQ drawdown since its inception was -23.11%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSQ and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUSQDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.11%

-86.69%

+63.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.11%

-14.41%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.04%

-30.27%

+15.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-57.31%

+50.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.43%

7.35%

+2.08%

Volatility

MUSQ vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ) is 4.86%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that MUSQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUSQDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

12.95%

-8.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

30.86%

-17.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.81%

34.97%

-18.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.86%

29.39%

-11.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

28.33%

-10.47%

MUSQ vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUSQ has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUSQ vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

MUSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than DBE's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.10%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
MUSQ
MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF
0.69%0.63%1.08%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUSQ and DBE have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to MUSQ (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUSQ dropped -23.11% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 1-year performance, DBE leads with 84.41% vs -4.15% for MUSQ. On fees, MUSQ is cheaper at 0.76% per year. On volatility, MUSQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBE has performed better with a 84.41% return vs -4.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MUSQ is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.69% for MUSQ.

MUSQ is categorized as Communications Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. MUSQ tracks MUSQ Global Music Industry Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for MUSQ and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUSQ and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer