MUSEX vs. FIHBX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MUSEX (MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund) and FIHBX (Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - MUSEX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by MFS, while FIHBX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Federated. Over the past 10 years, MUSEX returned 14.23%/yr vs 4.68%/yr for FIHBX. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MUSEX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FIHBX.

Performance

MUSEX vs. FIHBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund (MUSEX) and Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUSEX achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly higher than FIHBX's 0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, MUSEX has outperformed FIHBX with an annualized return of 14.23%, while FIHBX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.68% annualized return.

MUSEX

• 1D: 1.82%
• 1M: 0.76%
• 6M: 8.99%
• YTD: 11.18%
• 1Y: 21.28%
• 3Y*: 19.54%
• 5Y*: 13.44%
• 10Y*: 14.23%
• ALL TIME*: 9.53%

FIHBX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -0.67%
• 6M: 0.64%
• YTD: 0.85%
• 1Y: 4.14%
• 3Y*: 7.26%
• 5Y*: 3.11%
• 10Y*: 4.68%
• ALL TIME*: 7.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FIHBX Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MUSEX MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MUSEX vs. FIHBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MUSEX MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund	11.18%	16.10%	25.17%	28.30%	-16.02%	29.24%	15.47%	28.80%	-7.82%	18.95%
FIHBX Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund	0.85%	8.59%	6.40%	13.17%	-12.64%	3.92%	5.99%	15.01%	-2.80%	7.19%

Correlation

The correlation between MUSEX and FIHBX is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2002	0.31

The correlation between MUSEX and FIHBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.42 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MUSEX vs. FIHBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MUSEX

MUSEX Risk / Return Rank: 60
MUSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
MUSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
MUSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
MUSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
MUSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

FIHBX

FIHBX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FIHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FIHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FIHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FIHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FIHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MUSEX vs. FIHBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund (MUSEX) and Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MUSEX	FIHBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	1.33	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	2.28	-0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.32	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	1.85	+0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.32	9.24	+0.08

MUSEX vs. FIHBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUSEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the FIHBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUSEX and FIHBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MUSEX vs. FIHBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUSEX drawdown since its inception was -54.78%, which is greater than FIHBX's maximum drawdown of -31.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSEX and FIHBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUSEX	FIHBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.78%	-31.05%	-23.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.60%	-2.45%	-6.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.18%	-3.60%	-15.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.87%	-16.35%	-5.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.60%	-21.67%	-12.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.22%	-0.79%	-0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.55%	-2.28%	-8.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	0.49%	+1.55%

Volatility

MUSEX vs. FIHBX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund (MUSEX) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) at 0.64%. This indicates that MUSEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIHBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MUSEX	FIHBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.36%	0.64%	+2.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.15%	2.70%	+7.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.03%	3.42%	+9.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.12%	5.19%	+11.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.32%	5.71%	+12.61%

MUSEX vs. FIHBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUSEX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FIHBX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MUSEX vs. FIHBX - Dividend Comparison

MUSEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, more than FIHBX's 6.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIHBX Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund	6.04%	6.29%	5.94%	5.93%	4.58%	4.25%	5.14%	5.79%	6.24%	5.55%	5.75%	6.46%
MUSEX MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund	6.43%	7.15%	10.44%	3.91%	9.26%	16.18%	7.12%	5.19%	11.98%	2.04%	1.20%	3.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUSEX and FIHBX in my portfolio?

MUSEX and FIHBX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MUSEX or FIHBX?

MUSEX has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to FIHBX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUSEX dropped -54.78% vs FIHBX's -31.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUSEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.