PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUSEX vs. ECAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUSEX vs. ECAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund (MUSEX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUSEX achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly lower than ECAT's 12.58% return.


MUSEX

1D
0.58%
1M
4.39%
YTD
10.93%
6M
11.94%
1Y
27.41%
3Y*
22.58%
5Y*
14.31%
10Y*
14.56%

ECAT

1D
0.13%
1M
8.51%
YTD
12.58%
6M
11.54%
1Y
22.91%
3Y*
19.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUSEX vs. ECAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MUSEX
MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund
10.93%16.10%25.17%28.30%-16.02%9.04%
ECAT
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
12.58%16.64%19.96%32.36%-21.90%-6.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MUSEX and ECAT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021

0.72

The correlation between MUSEX and ECAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUSEX vs. ECAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUSEX
MUSEX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MUSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
MUSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

ECAT
ECAT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ECAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECAT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
ECAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUSEX vs. ECAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund (MUSEX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUSEXECATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.30

1.72

+0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.14

2.43

+0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.31

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

2.01

+1.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.36

7.58

+6.79

MUSEX vs. ECAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUSEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the ECAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUSEX and ECAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUSEXECATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.72

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.56

-0.03

Drawdowns

MUSEX vs. ECAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUSEX drawdown since its inception was -54.78%, which is greater than ECAT's maximum drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSEX and ECAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUSEXECATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.78%

-32.23%

-22.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.60%

-11.80%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-15.79%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.59%

-9.12%

-1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

3.14%

-1.21%

Volatility

MUSEX vs. ECAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund (MUSEX) is 2.58%, while BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that MUSEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUSEXECATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

2.90%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

10.51%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

13.39%

-1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

16.89%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.32%

16.89%

+1.43%

MUSEX vs. ECAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUSEX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ECAT's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUSEX vs. ECAT - Dividend Comparison

MUSEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, less than ECAT's 21.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECAT
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
21.45%23.00%17.44%9.14%8.94%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MUSEX
MFS Blended Research Core Equity Fund
6.45%7.15%10.44%3.91%9.26%16.18%7.12%5.19%11.98%2.04%1.20%3.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUSEX and ECAT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ECAT has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to MUSEX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUSEX dropped -54.78% vs ECAT's -32.23%.

MUSEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUSEX and ECAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer