IGCB vs. FLRN
Compare and contrast key facts about TCW Corporate Bond ETF (IGCB) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN).
IGCB and FLRN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGCB is a passively managed fund by TCW that tracks the performance of the Actively Managed. It was launched on Jun 29, 2018. FLRN is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). It was launched on Nov 30, 2011. Both IGCB and FLRN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IGCB vs. FLRN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IGCB vs. FLRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IGCB TCW Corporate Bond ETF | -0.36% | 8.42% | -0.39% |
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 0.80% | 5.01% | 0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGCB achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than FLRN's 0.80% return.
IGCB
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLRN
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 5.79%
- 5Y*
- 4.00%
- 10Y*
- 2.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGCB vs. FLRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGCB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRN's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IGCB vs. FLRN — Risk / Return Rank
IGCB
FLRN
IGCB vs. FLRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Corporate Bond ETF (IGCB) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGCB | FLRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | 2.49 | -1.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | 3.11 | -1.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 2.05 | -0.85 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 3.17 | -1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.73 | 25.95 | -20.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGCB | FLRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 2.49 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.49 | +0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between IGCB and FLRN is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IGCB vs. FLRN - Dividend Comparison
IGCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, which matches FLRN's 4.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGCB TCW Corporate Bond ETF | 4.67% | 4.52% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.65% | 4.89% | 5.67% | 5.68% | 1.95% | 0.39% | 1.22% | 2.76% | 2.39% | 1.64% | 1.06% | 0.63% |
Drawdowns
IGCB vs. FLRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGCB drawdown since its inception was -4.20%, smaller than the maximum FLRN drawdown of -14.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGCB and FLRN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGCB | FLRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -14.64% | +10.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.91% | -1.27% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -0.04% | -1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -1.85% | +0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 0.17% | +0.73% |
Volatility
IGCB vs. FLRN - Volatility Comparison
TCW Corporate Bond ETF (IGCB) has a higher volatility of 1.76% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) at 0.35%. This indicates that IGCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IGCB | FLRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.76% | 0.35% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.73% | 0.55% | +2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.65% | 1.82% | +2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 1.69% | +3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 4.21% | +0.72% |