MUR vs. WSM
MUR (Murphy Oil Corporation) and WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.) are both stocks. MUR operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while WSM operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, MUR returned 6.54%/yr vs 27.10%/yr for WSM. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MUR vs. WSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MUR having a 26.69% return and WSM slightly lower at 26.06%. Over the past 10 years, MUR has underperformed WSM with an annualized return of 6.54%, while WSM has yielded a comparatively higher 27.10% annualized return.
MUR
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 26.69%
- 6M
- 18.64%
- 1Y
- 59.62%
- 3Y*
- 4.53%
- 5Y*
- 14.02%
- 10Y*
- 6.54%
WSM
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 28.73%
- YTD
- 26.06%
- 6M
- 20.02%
- 1Y
- 47.32%
- 3Y*
- 53.75%
- 5Y*
- 23.70%
- 10Y*
- 27.10%
MUR vs. WSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUR Murphy Oil Corporation | 26.69% | 8.68% | -26.77% | 1.98% | 68.50% | 121.37% | -52.74% | 19.48% | -22.09% | 3.41% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 26.06% | -2.09% | 86.56% | 80.24% | -30.49% | 68.60% | 42.38% | 50.07% | 0.61% | 10.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUR and WSM is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.21 |
The correlation between MUR and WSM shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.23 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MUR:
$5.61B
WSM:
$26.80B
MUR:
$369.23
WSM:
$8.93
MUR:
0.11
WSM:
25.04
MUR:
0.00
WSM:
5.06
MUR:
0.01
WSM:
3.46
MUR:
0.00
WSM:
14.33
MUR:
$735.60B
WSM:
$7.88B
MUR:
$1.73B
WSM:
$3.63B
MUR:
$329.24B
WSM:
$1.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUR vs. WSM — Risk / Return Rank
MUR
WSM
MUR vs. WSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Murphy Oil Corporation (MUR) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUR | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 2.01 | +1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.95 | 4.55 | +4.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUR vs. WSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUR drawdown since its inception was -92.11%, roughly equal to the maximum WSM drawdown of -89.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUR and WSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUR | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.11% | -89.01% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.26% | -23.27% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.47% | -36.79% | -21.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.47% | -51.92% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.10% | -59.71% | -26.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.01% | 0.00% | -19.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.26% | -25.03% | -1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.43% | 10.25% | -2.82% |
Volatility
MUR vs. WSM - Volatility Comparison
Murphy Oil Corporation (MUR) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) have volatilities of 12.52% and 12.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUR | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.52% | 12.02% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.38% | 25.57% | +9.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.59% | 34.63% | +12.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.11% | 44.77% | +1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.34% | 44.26% | +11.08% |
Dividends
MUR vs. WSM - Dividend Comparison
MUR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, more than WSM's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUR Murphy Oil Corporation | 3.48% | 4.16% | 3.97% | 2.58% | 1.92% | 1.91% | 5.17% | 3.73% | 4.28% | 3.22% | 3.85% | 6.24% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.23% | 1.43% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% |
Financials
MUR vs. WSM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Murphy Oil Corporation and Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MUR vs. WSM - Profitability Comparison
MUR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy Oil Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 733.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 793.43M and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.
MUR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy Oil Corporation reported an operating income of 1.20B and revenue of 733.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.
WSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 291.69M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
MUR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Murphy Oil Corporation reported a net income of 52.99B and revenue of 733.55B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.
WSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 231.36M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MUR and WSM have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUR has higher volatility (12.52%) compared to WSM (12.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUR dropped -92.11% vs WSM's -89.01%.
MUR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUR and WSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer