PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUND vs. THYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUND vs. THYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUND) and T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF (THYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUND achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly lower than THYM's 3.16% return.


MUND

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
1.28%
6M
1.54%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

THYM

1D
-0.52%
1M
0.50%
YTD
3.16%
6M
3.44%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUND vs. THYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MUND and THYM is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUND vs. THYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUND) and T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF (THYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MUND vs. THYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUNDTHYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

1.50

-0.51

Drawdowns

MUND vs. THYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUND drawdown since its inception was -4.19%, which is greater than THYM's maximum drawdown of -2.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUND and THYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUNDTHYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-2.93%

-1.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-0.52%

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-0.49%

-1.39%

Volatility

MUND vs. THYM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUNDTHYMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.29%

4.40%

+2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.29%

4.40%

+2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.29%

4.40%

+2.89%

MUND vs. THYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUND has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than THYM's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUND vs. THYM - Dividend Comparison

MUND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than THYM's 2.19% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MUND and THYM have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MUND is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MUND is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for THYM.

MUND has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 2.19% for THYM.

MUND is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while THYM is High Yield Muni. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for MUND and 0.32% for THYM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUND and THYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer