MUND vs. IQDY
MUND (Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF) and IQDY (FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MUND is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Northern Trust, while IQDY is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index. MUND is actively managed, while IQDY is passively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MUND charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IQDY.
Performance
MUND vs. IQDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUND achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly lower than IQDY's 13.88% return.
MUND
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 1.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQDY
- 1D
- -4.01%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 13.88%
- 6M
- 16.16%
- 1Y
- 35.23%
- 3Y*
- 22.73%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
MUND vs. IQDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MUND Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF | 1.28% | 4.34% |
IQDY FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund | 13.88% | 11.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUND and IQDY is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUND vs. IQDY — Risk / Return Rank
MUND
IQDY
MUND vs. IQDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF (MUND) and FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund (IQDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUND | IQDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.48 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
MUND vs. IQDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUND drawdown since its inception was -4.19%, smaller than the maximum IQDY drawdown of -39.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUND and IQDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUND | IQDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -39.60% | +35.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.96% | -4.30% | +2.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.88% | -9.10% | +7.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.66% | — |
Volatility
MUND vs. IQDY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUND | IQDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.29% | 16.44% | -9.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.29% | 17.89% | -10.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.29% | 18.47% | -11.18% |
MUND vs. IQDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUND has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IQDY's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUND vs. IQDY - Dividend Comparison
MUND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than IQDY's 2.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQDY FlexShares International Quality Dividend Dynamic Index Fund | 2.86% | 3.26% | 6.95% | 6.45% | 5.52% | 3.89% | 2.62% | 3.85% | 5.97% | 3.57% | 3.77% | 4.08% |
MUND Northern Trust 2055 Tax-Exempt Distributing Ladder ETF | 2.81% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUND and IQDY have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUND is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUND is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IQDY.
IQDY has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 2.81% for MUND.
MUND is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while IQDY is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for MUND and 0.47% for IQDY.
Find the right allocation for MUND and IQDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer