MULT vs. VGMS

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MULT (Franklin Multisector Income ETF) and VGMS (Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MULT charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VGMS.

Performance

MULT vs. VGMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Multisector Income ETF (MULT) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MULT achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly lower than VGMS's 1.17% return.

MULT

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -0.64%
• 6M: 0.44%
• YTD: 0.70%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

VGMS

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.55%
• 6M: 0.55%
• YTD: 1.17%
• 1Y: 4.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MULT Franklin Multisector Income ETF	$6.84K	$5.44K	$4.97K
VGMS Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF	$2.48M	$2.33M	$2.03M

MULT vs. VGMS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MULT Franklin Multisector Income ETF	0.70%	2.14%
VGMS Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF	1.17%	2.38%

Correlation

The correlation between MULT and VGMS is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025	0.72

Return for Risk

MULT vs. VGMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MULT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VGMS

VGMS Risk / Return Rank: 70
VGMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
VGMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
VGMS Omega Ratio Rank: 72
VGMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VGMS Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MULT vs. VGMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Multisector Income ETF (MULT) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MULT	VGMS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.60	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.35	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.10	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.26	—

Drawdowns

MULT vs. VGMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MULT drawdown since its inception was -1.70%, smaller than the maximum VGMS drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MULT and VGMS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MULT	VGMS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.70%	-2.46%	+0.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-0.71%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.32%	-0.31%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MULT	VGMS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.74%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.70%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.93%	3.24%	-0.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.93%	3.17%	-0.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.93%	3.17%	-0.24%

MULT vs. VGMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MULT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VGMS's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

MULT vs. VGMS - Dividend Comparison

MULT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than VGMS's 5.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
MULT Franklin Multisector Income ETF	3.82%	1.56%
VGMS Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF	4.96%	2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MULT and VGMS in my portfolio?

MULT and VGMS have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MULT or VGMS?

On fees, VGMS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MULT or VGMS?

VGMS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MULT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MULT or VGMS?

VGMS has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 3.82% for MULT.

What is the main difference between MULT and VGMS?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MULT and 0.30% for VGMS.