PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MULT vs. VGMS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MULT vs. VGMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Multisector Income ETF (MULT) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MULT achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than VGMS's 1.29% return.


MULT

1D
0.12%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.95%
6M
1.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VGMS

1D
0.23%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.72%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MULT vs. VGMS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MULT and VGMS is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025

0.73

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MULT vs. VGMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Multisector Income ETF (MULT) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MULT vs. VGMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MULTVGMSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.40

2.18

-0.78

Drawdowns

MULT vs. VGMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MULT drawdown since its inception was -1.70%, smaller than the maximum VGMS drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MULT and VGMS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MULTVGMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-2.46%

+0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.16%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.31%

-0.31%

0.00%

Volatility

MULT vs. VGMS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MULTVGMSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94%

3.21%

-0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.94%

3.21%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.94%

3.21%

-0.27%

MULT vs. VGMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MULT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VGMS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

MULT vs. VGMS - Dividend Comparison

MULT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than VGMS's 5.15% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MULT and VGMS have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VGMS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGMS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MULT.

VGMS has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 3.40% for MULT.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MULT and 0.30% for VGMS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MULT and VGMS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer