MULT vs. XUDV
MULT (Franklin Multisector Income ETF) and XUDV (Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MULT is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin, while XUDV is a Dividend fund tracking the VettaFi New Frontier U.S. Dividend Select Index. MULT is actively managed, while XUDV is passively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MULT charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XUDV.
Performance
MULT vs. XUDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MULT achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than XUDV's 20.90% return.
MULT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XUDV
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 20.90%
- 6M
- 19.15%
- 1Y
- 31.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULT vs. XUDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MULT Franklin Multisector Income ETF | 1.03% | 2.14% |
XUDV Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF | 20.90% | 1.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between MULT and XUDV is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MULT vs. XUDV — Risk / Return Rank
MULT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XUDV
MULT vs. XUDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Multisector Income ETF (MULT) and Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MULT | XUDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MULT vs. XUDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MULT drawdown since its inception was -1.70%, smaller than the maximum XUDV drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MULT and XUDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MULT | XUDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.70% | -15.98% | +14.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -1.49% | +1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.32% | -2.06% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.88% | — |
Volatility
MULT vs. XUDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MULT | XUDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.95% | 12.48% | -9.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.95% | 16.33% | -13.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.95% | 16.33% | -13.38% |
MULT vs. XUDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MULT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XUDV's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
MULT vs. XUDV - Dividend Comparison
MULT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than XUDV's 2.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MULT Franklin Multisector Income ETF | 3.40% | 1.56% |
XUDV Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF | 2.57% | 3.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MULT and XUDV have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUDV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUDV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MULT.
MULT has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 2.57% for XUDV.
MULT is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while XUDV is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MULT and 0.09% for XUDV.
Find the right allocation for MULT and XUDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer