PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MULT vs. ABI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MULT vs. ABI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Multisector Income ETF (MULT) and VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MULT achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than ABI's 2.79% return.


MULT

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.03%
6M
1.23%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ABI

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.50%
YTD
2.79%
6M
2.83%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MULT vs. ABI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MULT and ABI is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MULT vs. ABI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Multisector Income ETF (MULT) and VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MULT vs. ABI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MULT vs. ABI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MULT drawdown since its inception was -1.70%, which is greater than ABI's maximum drawdown of -0.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MULT and ABI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MULTABIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-0.95%

-0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.04%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.32%

-0.18%

-0.14%

Volatility

MULT vs. ABI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MULTABIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95%

1.27%

+1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.95%

1.27%

+1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.95%

1.27%

+1.68%

MULT vs. ABI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MULT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ABI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MULT vs. ABI - Dividend Comparison

MULT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than ABI's 5.69% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MULT and ABI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MULT is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MULT is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ABI.

ABI has the higher dividend yield at 5.69%, compared with 3.40% for MULT.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MULT and 0.65% for ABI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MULT and ABI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer