MULT vs. JOJO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MULT (Franklin Multisector Income ETF) and JOJO (ATAC Credit Rotation ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MULT charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for JOJO.

Performance

MULT vs. JOJO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Multisector Income ETF (MULT) and ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MULT achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly lower than JOJO's 3.38% return.

MULT

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 0.84%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.24%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JOJO

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: 1.27%
• YTD: 3.38%
• 6M: 3.40%
• 1Y: 9.76%
• 3Y*: 7.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MULT vs. JOJO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MULT Franklin Multisector Income ETF	1.18%	2.14%
JOJO ATAC Credit Rotation ETF	3.38%	3.21%

Correlation

The correlation between MULT and JOJO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025	0.62

Return for Risk

MULT vs. JOJO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MULT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JOJO

JOJO Risk / Return Rank: 46
JOJO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
JOJO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
JOJO Omega Ratio Rank: 49
JOJO Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
JOJO Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MULT vs. JOJO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Multisector Income ETF (MULT) and ATAC Credit Rotation ETF (JOJO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MULT	JOJO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.43	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.20	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.28	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.99	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.42	—

Drawdowns

MULT vs. JOJO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MULT drawdown since its inception was -1.70%, smaller than the maximum JOJO drawdown of -28.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MULT and JOJO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MULT	JOJO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.70%	-28.43%	+26.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-4.89%	+4.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.32%	-15.69%	+15.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.81%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MULT	JOJO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.20%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.96%	6.88%	-3.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.96%	11.27%	-8.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.96%	11.27%	-8.31%

MULT vs. JOJO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MULT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than JOJO's 1.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

MULT vs. JOJO - Dividend Comparison

MULT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than JOJO's 5.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JOJO ATAC Credit Rotation ETF	5.07%	4.78%	4.88%	4.30%	3.63%	2.53%
MULT Franklin Multisector Income ETF	3.40%	1.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MULT and JOJO in my portfolio?

MULT and JOJO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MULT or JOJO?

On fees, MULT is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MULT or JOJO?

MULT is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for JOJO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MULT or JOJO?

JOJO has the higher dividend yield at 5.07%, compared with 3.40% for MULT.

What is the main difference between MULT and JOJO?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin and ATAC. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MULT and 1.28% for JOJO.