MUHLX vs. TIGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) and TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund (TIGRX).
MUHLX is managed by Muhlenkamp. It was launched on Nov 1, 1988. TIGRX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Jul 1, 1999.
Performance
MUHLX vs. TIGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MUHLX vs. TIGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund | 9.11% | 17.82% | 3.38% | 13.92% | 2.89% | 28.98% | 11.96% | 14.39% | -13.29% | 18.78% |
TIGRX TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund | -6.84% | 13.92% | 29.01% | 32.97% | -22.15% | 25.55% | 20.49% | 30.29% | -7.33% | 23.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUHLX achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly higher than TIGRX's -6.84% return. Over the past 10 years, MUHLX has underperformed TIGRX with an annualized return of 10.68%, while TIGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.36% annualized return.
MUHLX
- 1D
- 2.42%
- 1M
- -5.65%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 6M
- 10.37%
- 1Y
- 22.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 12.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.68%
TIGRX
- 1D
- 3.01%
- 1M
- -6.09%
- YTD
- -6.84%
- 6M
- -4.55%
- 1Y
- 13.06%
- 3Y*
- 18.18%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- 13.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MUHLX vs. TIGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUHLX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than TIGRX's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MUHLX vs. TIGRX — Risk / Return Rank
MUHLX
TIGRX
MUHLX vs. TIGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) and TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund (TIGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MUHLX | TIGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.42 | 0.73 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.97 | 1.14 | +0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.17 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 1.00 | +1.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.57 | 3.86 | +4.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUHLX | TIGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 0.73 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.48 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.40 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between MUHLX and TIGRX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MUHLX vs. TIGRX - Dividend Comparison
MUHLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than TIGRX's 14.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund | 3.06% | 3.34% | 0.58% | 0.89% | 6.80% | 7.77% | 10.28% | 1.26% | 14.70% | 4.30% | 0.00% | 11.02% |
TIGRX TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund | 14.88% | 14.09% | 11.70% | 24.27% | 9.52% | 19.80% | 7.44% | 6.61% | 9.98% | 4.60% | 3.06% | 8.41% |
Drawdowns
MUHLX vs. TIGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUHLX drawdown since its inception was -62.05%, which is greater than TIGRX's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUHLX and TIGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUHLX | TIGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.05% | -49.52% | -12.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.23% | -12.10% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.63% | -27.16% | +8.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.85% | -35.56% | -5.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.65% | -8.60% | +2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.81% | -11.24% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 3.13% | -0.30% |
Volatility
MUHLX vs. TIGRX - Volatility Comparison
Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) and TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund (TIGRX) have volatilities of 6.01% and 5.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MUHLX | TIGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 5.78% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.06% | 10.49% | +1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.85% | 18.84% | -1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.77% | 22.57% | -7.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 21.34% | -4.30% |