PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIGRX vs. RGAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIGRX vs. RGAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund (TIGRX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIGRX achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly lower than RGAGX's 10.24% return. Over the past 10 years, TIGRX has underperformed RGAGX with an annualized return of 14.77%, while RGAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.39% annualized return.


TIGRX

1D
0.25%
1M
5.35%
YTD
8.50%
6M
8.30%
1Y
25.37%
3Y*
21.83%
5Y*
13.20%
10Y*
14.77%

RGAGX

1D
-0.33%
1M
6.84%
YTD
10.24%
6M
9.86%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
25.54%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*
16.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIGRX vs. RGAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIGRX
TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund
8.50%13.92%29.01%32.97%-22.15%25.55%20.49%30.29%-7.33%23.72%
RGAGX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6
10.24%20.08%28.41%37.66%-30.53%19.67%38.30%29.22%-2.88%26.53%

Correlation

The correlation between TIGRX and RGAGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2009

0.96

The correlation between TIGRX and RGAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIGRX vs. RGAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIGRX
TIGRX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
TIGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TIGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

RGAGX
RGAGX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
RGAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RGAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIGRX vs. RGAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund (TIGRX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TIGRXRGAGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

1.80

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.76

2.46

+0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

1.99

+0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.75

7.76

+1.98

TIGRX vs. RGAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the RGAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIGRX and RGAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TIGRXRGAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.80

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.64

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.84

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.86

-0.43

Drawdowns

TIGRX vs. RGAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIGRX drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, which is greater than RGAGX's maximum drawdown of -36.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIGRX and RGAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIGRXRGAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.52%

-36.19%

-13.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.27%

-13.71%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.79%

-21.54%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.16%

-36.19%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.56%

-36.19%

+0.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.33%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.18%

-5.49%

-5.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

3.50%

-0.81%

Volatility

TIGRX vs. RGAGX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund (TIGRX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) have volatilities of 3.68% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIGRXRGAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

3.69%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

11.65%

-1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.22%

15.15%

-1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.56%

20.25%

+2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.37%

19.69%

+1.68%

TIGRX vs. RGAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIGRX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than RGAGX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIGRX vs. RGAGX - Dividend Comparison

TIGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.78%, more than RGAGX's 9.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RGAGX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6
9.97%10.99%9.29%7.70%4.44%8.49%4.57%7.93%12.36%7.34%6.95%9.22%
TIGRX
TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund
12.78%14.09%11.70%24.27%9.52%19.80%7.44%6.61%9.98%4.60%3.06%8.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, TIGRX and RGAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RGAGX has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to TIGRX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIGRX dropped -49.52% vs RGAGX's -36.19%.

TIGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIGRX and RGAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer