PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIGRX vs. TILGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIGRX vs. TILGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund (TIGRX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TIGRX having a 8.23% return and TILGX slightly lower at 8.21%. Over the past 10 years, TIGRX has underperformed TILGX with an annualized return of 14.74%, while TILGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.76% annualized return.


TIGRX

1D
0.37%
1M
4.49%
YTD
8.23%
6M
8.23%
1Y
25.75%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
13.04%
10Y*
14.74%

TILGX

1D
0.45%
1M
5.28%
YTD
8.21%
6M
7.33%
1Y
25.11%
3Y*
22.95%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
16.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIGRX vs. TILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIGRX
TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund
8.23%13.92%29.01%32.97%-22.15%25.55%20.49%30.29%-7.33%23.72%
TILGX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class
8.21%15.25%29.23%47.05%-32.76%16.84%44.23%30.76%-0.38%33.89%

Correlation

The correlation between TIGRX and TILGX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2006

0.94

The correlation between TIGRX and TILGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIGRX vs. TILGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIGRX
TIGRX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
TIGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TIGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

TILGX
TILGX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
TILGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
TILGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIGRX vs. TILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund (TIGRX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TIGRXTILGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.00

1.69

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.78

2.29

+0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.30

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

1.74

+0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.06

5.88

+4.18

TIGRX vs. TILGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the TILGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIGRX and TILGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TIGRXTILGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

1.69

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.53

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.78

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.57

-0.14

Drawdowns

TIGRX vs. TILGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIGRX drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, smaller than the maximum TILGX drawdown of -52.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIGRX and TILGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIGRXTILGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.52%

-52.16%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.27%

-15.19%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.79%

-23.94%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.16%

-37.86%

+10.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.56%

-37.86%

+2.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.18%

-8.85%

-2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

4.50%

-1.81%

Volatility

TIGRX vs. TILGX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund (TIGRX) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) at 3.07%. This indicates that TIGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIGRXTILGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

3.07%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

11.35%

-1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.25%

15.59%

-2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.56%

21.87%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.37%

21.61%

-0.24%

TIGRX vs. TILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TIGRX and TILGX have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

TIGRX vs. TILGX - Dividend Comparison

TIGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.81%, which matches TILGX's 12.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TIGRX
TIAA-CREF Growth & Income Fund
12.81%14.09%11.70%24.27%9.52%19.80%7.44%6.61%9.98%4.60%3.06%8.41%
TILGX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class
12.82%13.87%6.41%0.22%0.42%10.49%37.04%4.41%14.12%3.83%1.82%3.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, TIGRX and TILGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TIGRX has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to TILGX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIGRX dropped -49.52% vs TILGX's -52.16%.

TIGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIGRX and TILGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer