MUBFX vs. MSXAX
Compare and contrast key facts about MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) and NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A (MSXAX).
MUBFX is managed by New York Life. It was launched on Jan 21, 1971. MSXAX is a passively managed fund by New York Life that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Jan 2, 2004.
Performance
MUBFX vs. MSXAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MUBFX vs. MSXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUBFX MainStay WMC Value Fund | -1.97% | 14.74% | 10.72% | 9.62% | -4.54% | 28.60% | 13.62% | 31.67% | -6.89% | 22.71% |
MSXAX NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A | -7.16% | 17.26% | 23.98% | 25.96% | -18.52% | 28.13% | 17.86% | 30.69% | -4.71% | 21.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUBFX achieves a -1.97% return, which is significantly higher than MSXAX's -7.16% return. Over the past 10 years, MUBFX has underperformed MSXAX with an annualized return of 12.18%, while MSXAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.18% annualized return.
MUBFX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -1.97%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 9.69%
- 3Y*
- 11.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
MSXAX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -7.71%
- YTD
- -7.16%
- 6M
- -4.84%
- 1Y
- 13.86%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.85%
- 10Y*
- 13.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MUBFX vs. MSXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUBFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than MSXAX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MUBFX vs. MSXAX — Risk / Return Rank
MUBFX
MSXAX
MUBFX vs. MSXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) and NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A (MSXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MUBFX | MSXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.69 | 0.81 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | 1.26 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 0.95 | -0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.48 | 4.60 | -1.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUBFX | MSXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 | 0.81 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.65 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.73 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.51 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between MUBFX and MSXAX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MUBFX vs. MSXAX - Dividend Comparison
MUBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.53%, more than MSXAX's 1.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUBFX MainStay WMC Value Fund | 7.53% | 7.38% | 5.24% | 4.49% | 5.82% | 81.14% | 3.79% | 8.43% | 11.90% | 11.15% | 2.53% | 19.99% |
MSXAX NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A | 1.14% | 1.06% | 5.20% | 4.04% | 10.30% | 4.44% | 8.78% | 17.42% | 14.49% | 15.18% | 9.63% | 5.53% |
Drawdowns
MUBFX vs. MSXAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUBFX drawdown since its inception was -53.31%, roughly equal to the maximum MSXAX drawdown of -55.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUBFX and MSXAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUBFX | MSXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.31% | -55.48% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -12.11% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.61% | -24.78% | +9.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.31% | -33.79% | -5.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.59% | -8.97% | +2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -7.21% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 2.58% | -0.03% |
Volatility
MUBFX vs. MSXAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) is 3.13%, while NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A (MSXAX) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that MUBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MUBFX | MSXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 4.24% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.07% | 9.09% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.63% | 18.13% | -2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 16.87% | -2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 18.03% | -0.12% |