PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSXAX vs. SCSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSXAX vs. SCSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A (MSXAX) and Allspring Common Stock Fund (SCSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSXAX achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly lower than SCSAX's 16.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MSXAX has outperformed SCSAX with an annualized return of 15.05%, while SCSAX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.54% annualized return.


MSXAX

1D
-0.09%
1M
-2.05%
YTD
7.87%
6M
6.53%
1Y
21.62%
3Y*
20.15%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
15.05%

SCSAX

1D
0.67%
1M
4.73%
YTD
16.36%
6M
14.04%
1Y
20.98%
3Y*
11.81%
5Y*
4.66%
10Y*
11.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSXAX vs. SCSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSXAX
NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A
7.87%17.26%23.98%25.96%-18.52%28.13%17.86%30.69%-4.71%21.07%
SCSAX
Allspring Common Stock Fund
16.36%1.44%6.51%15.90%-17.71%21.14%15.34%47.23%-10.02%17.54%

Correlation

The correlation between MSXAX and SCSAX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2003

0.89

The correlation between MSXAX and SCSAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSXAX vs. SCSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSXAX
MSXAX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
MSXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MSXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SCSAX
SCSAX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SCSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
SCSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSXAX vs. SCSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A (MSXAX) and Allspring Common Stock Fund (SCSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSXAXSCSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.19

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

1.57

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.81

5.48

+5.34

MSXAX vs. SCSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSXAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the SCSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSXAX and SCSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSXAX vs. SCSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSXAX drawdown since its inception was -55.48%, roughly equal to the maximum SCSAX drawdown of -53.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSXAX and SCSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSXAXSCSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.48%

-53.49%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-12.68%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.78%

-26.64%

+7.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.78%

-38.46%

+13.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.79%

-45.63%

+11.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.23%

-1.12%

-2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.15%

-10.27%

+3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

3.62%

-1.61%

Volatility

MSXAX vs. SCSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A (MSXAX) is 4.86%, while Allspring Common Stock Fund (SCSAX) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that MSXAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSXAXSCSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

6.68%

-1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.92%

14.68%

-4.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.55%

18.71%

-6.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.01%

23.96%

-6.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

24.00%

-5.91%

MSXAX vs. SCSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSXAX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than SCSAX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSXAX vs. SCSAX - Dividend Comparison

MSXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than SCSAX's 3.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSXAX
NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A
0.98%1.06%5.20%4.04%10.30%4.44%8.78%17.42%14.49%15.18%9.63%5.53%
SCSAX
Allspring Common Stock Fund
3.79%4.42%6.38%3.56%17.66%19.38%4.87%26.88%18.74%11.05%3.82%12.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSXAX and SCSAX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCSAX has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to MSXAX (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSXAX dropped -55.48% vs SCSAX's -53.49%.

MSXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSXAX and SCSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer