MUBFX vs. MXFIX
MUBFX (MainStay WMC Value Fund) and MXFIX (MainStay Floating Rate Fund) are both mutual funds - MUBFX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by New York Life, while MXFIX is a Bank Loan fund managed by New York Life. Over the past 10 years, MUBFX returned 13.06%/yr vs 4.62%/yr for MXFIX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MUBFX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for MXFIX.
Performance
MUBFX vs. MXFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUBFX achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly higher than MXFIX's 0.87% return. Over the past 10 years, MUBFX has outperformed MXFIX with an annualized return of 13.06%, while MXFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.62% annualized return.
MUBFX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 6.73%
- 1Y
- 19.72%
- 3Y*
- 13.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.06%
MXFIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 6.78%
- 5Y*
- 5.07%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
MUBFX vs. MXFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUBFX MainStay WMC Value Fund | 7.39% | 14.74% | 10.72% | 9.62% | -4.54% | 28.60% | 13.62% | 31.67% | -6.89% | 22.71% |
MXFIX MainStay Floating Rate Fund | 0.87% | 5.47% | 7.80% | 11.43% | -1.27% | 3.40% | 2.65% | 8.46% | -0.41% | 4.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUBFX and MXFIX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2004 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUBFX vs. MXFIX — Risk / Return Rank
MUBFX
MXFIX
MUBFX vs. MXFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) and MainStay Floating Rate Fund (MXFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUBFX | MXFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.60 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 2.64 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.42 | 8.38 | +3.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUBFX vs. MXFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUBFX drawdown since its inception was -53.31%, which is greater than MXFIX's maximum drawdown of -25.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUBFX and MXFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUBFX | MXFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.31% | -25.01% | -28.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.67% | -1.73% | -4.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.19% | -2.57% | -11.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.61% | -6.34% | -9.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.31% | -20.09% | -19.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | -0.12% | -1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.16% | -1.21% | -4.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 0.54% | +1.21% |
Volatility
MUBFX vs. MXFIX - Volatility Comparison
MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to MainStay Floating Rate Fund (MXFIX) at 0.62%. This indicates that MUBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUBFX | MXFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 0.62% | +2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.81% | 1.81% | +6.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.76% | 2.45% | +8.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.81% | 2.69% | +12.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 3.82% | +14.09% |
MUBFX vs. MXFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUBFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than MXFIX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUBFX vs. MXFIX - Dividend Comparison
MUBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.87%, less than MXFIX's 7.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUBFX MainStay WMC Value Fund | 6.87% | 7.38% | 5.24% | 4.49% | 5.82% | 81.14% | 3.79% | 8.43% | 11.90% | 11.15% | 2.53% | 19.99% |
MXFIX MainStay Floating Rate Fund | 7.18% | 7.41% | 7.49% | 7.50% | 4.51% | 2.90% | 3.46% | 4.87% | 4.85% | 4.09% | 3.75% | 3.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUBFX and MXFIX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUBFX has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to MXFIX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUBFX dropped -53.31% vs MXFIX's -25.01%.
MXFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUBFX and MXFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer