MUB vs. UGA
MUB (iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - MUB is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MUB returned 2.00%/yr vs 14.43%/yr for UGA. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. MUB charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
MUB vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUB achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 75.49% return. Over the past 10 years, MUB has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of 2.00%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.43% annualized return.
MUB
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 6.95%
- 3Y*
- 3.43%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- 2.00%
UGA
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -12.35%
- YTD
- 75.49%
- 6M
- 64.35%
- 1Y
- 80.94%
- 3Y*
- 22.21%
- 5Y*
- 25.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.43%
MUB vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUB iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF | 1.24% | 3.78% | 1.26% | 5.56% | -7.34% | 1.02% | 5.12% | 7.06% | 0.93% | 4.72% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 75.49% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUB and UGA is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2008 | -0.07 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between MUB and UGA has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.07 to -0.33, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUB vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
MUB
UGA
MUB vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MUB | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.37 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 5.47 | -2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | 13.25 | -4.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUB | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 2.32 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.73 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.39 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.12 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
MUB vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUB drawdown since its inception was -13.68%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUB and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUB | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.68% | -86.59% | +72.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -14.88% | +12.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.34% | -26.68% | +21.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.88% | -38.11% | +26.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.68% | -75.89% | +62.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -12.35% | +11.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -36.76% | +34.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 6.13% | -5.34% |
Volatility
MUB vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) is 0.97%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.66%. This indicates that MUB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUB | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | 11.66% | -10.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.22% | 30.41% | -28.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92% | 35.14% | -32.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.06% | 34.38% | -30.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 37.27% | -32.35% |
MUB vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUB vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
MUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUB iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF | 3.17% | 3.14% | 3.01% | 2.65% | 2.11% | 1.81% | 2.11% | 2.42% | 2.46% | 2.26% | 2.21% | 2.51% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUB and UGA have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (11.66%) compared to MUB (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUB dropped -13.68% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 14.43% vs 2.00% for MUB. On fees, MUB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, MUB has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 14.43% return vs 2.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MUB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
MUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
MUB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while UGA is Oil & Gas. MUB tracks S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for MUB and 0.75% for UGA.
MUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUB and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer