PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MU vs. SMSN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MU vs. SMSN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 244.07% return, which is significantly higher than SMSN.L's 161.93% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has outperformed SMSN.L with an annualized return of 55.83%, while SMSN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 27.99% annualized return.


MU

1D
-1.43%
1M
22.15%
YTD
244.07%
6M
307.41%
1Y
746.93%
3Y*
144.69%
5Y*
66.21%
10Y*
55.83%

SMSN.L

1D
6.51%
1M
13.49%
YTD
161.93%
6M
204.19%
1Y
399.27%
3Y*
59.18%
5Y*
26.81%
10Y*
27.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MU vs. SMSN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
244.07%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-22.84%87.59%
SMSN.L
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd
161.93%130.81%-37.94%38.34%-31.32%-8.01%60.01%41.56%-25.35%62.93%

Correlation

The correlation between MU and SMSN.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2006

0.24

Over the past year, MU and SMSN.L have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MU:

$1.12T

SMSN.L:

$1.46T

EPS

MU:

$21.26

SMSN.L:

₩320.04K

PE Ratio

MU:

46.18

SMSN.L:

25.63

PEG Ratio

MU:

0.17

SMSN.L:

0.77

PS Ratio

MU:

19.16

SMSN.L:

5.67

PB Ratio

MU:

15.44

SMSN.L:

4.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

MU:

$58.12B

SMSN.L:

₩389.99T

Gross Profit (TTM)

MU:

$33.96B

SMSN.L:

₩152.35T

EBITDA (TTM)

MU:

$25.99B

SMSN.L:

₩68.67T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MU vs. SMSN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SMSN.L
SMSN.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
SMSN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMSN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MU vs. SMSN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUSMSN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.78

1.75

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

24.91

18.03

+6.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

94.64

57.94

+36.69

MU vs. SMSN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MU Sharpe Ratio is 10.83, which is higher than the SMSN.L Sharpe Ratio of 7.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MU and SMSN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MU vs. SMSN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than SMSN.L's maximum drawdown of -55.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and SMSN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUSMSN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.25%

-55.59%

-42.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.28%

-21.96%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.63%

-44.52%

-13.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.63%

-49.12%

-8.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.63%

-54.44%

-3.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.07%

-8.55%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.16%

-17.37%

-40.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.95%

6.85%

+1.10%

Volatility

MU vs. SMSN.L - Volatility Comparison

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 32.86% compared to Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) at 20.71%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMSN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUSMSN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.86%

20.71%

+12.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.74%

43.80%

+13.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.66%

51.06%

+18.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.18%

34.83%

+18.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.12%

32.95%

+17.17%

Dividends

MU vs. SMSN.L - Dividend Comparison

MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than SMSN.L's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMSN.L
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd
0.35%0.94%2.88%1.79%2.50%1.85%3.60%2.47%3.65%1.62%1.68%1.71%

Financials

MU vs. SMSN.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Micron Technology, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00T40.00T60.00T80.00T100.00T120.00T140.00TJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
23.86B
133.87T
(MU) Total Revenue
(SMSN.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MU values in USD, SMSN.L values in KRW

MU vs. SMSN.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Micron Technology, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
74.4%
61.2%
Portfolio components
MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

SMSN.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a gross profit of 81.91T and revenue of 133.87T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

SMSN.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported an operating income of 58.98T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in an operating margin of 44.1%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.

SMSN.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a net income of 48.66T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in a net margin of 36.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MU and SMSN.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MU and SMSN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer