MU vs. SMH
MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, MU returned 54.18%/yr vs 36.59%/yr for SMH. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MU vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 243.32% return, which is significantly higher than SMH's 69.67% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has outperformed SMH with an annualized return of 54.18%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively lower 36.59% annualized return.
MU
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- 6M
- 183.94%
- YTD
- 243.32%
- 1Y
- 687.66%
- 3Y*
- 149.71%
- 5Y*
- 66.39%
- 10Y*
- 54.18%
SMH
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 56.99%
- YTD
- 69.67%
- 1Y
- 113.20%
- 3Y*
- 59.96%
- 5Y*
- 37.42%
- 10Y*
- 36.59%
MU vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 243.32% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 69.67% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and SMH is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000 | 0.72 |
The correlation between MU and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MU vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
MU
SMH
MU vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MU | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.47 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 23.23 | 7.62 | +15.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 83.25 | 25.13 | +58.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MU vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MU | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -84.96% | -13.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.28% | -14.93% | -15.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.63% | -35.74% | -21.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | -45.30% | -12.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.63% | -45.30% | -12.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.29% | -8.65% | -10.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.07% | -40.95% | -17.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.43% | 4.52% | +3.91% |
Volatility
MU vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 33.63% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 18.27%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MU | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.63% | 18.27% | +15.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.19% | 31.01% | +31.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.68% | 36.41% | +39.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.75% | 36.12% | +18.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.65% | 33.10% | +17.55% |
Dividends
MU vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MU and SMH have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (33.63%) compared to SMH (18.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs SMH's -84.96%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.29 vs 3.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MU and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer