PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MU vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MU vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 243.32% return, which is significantly higher than SMH's 69.67% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has outperformed SMH with an annualized return of 54.18%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively lower 36.59% annualized return.


MU

1D
-1.24%
1M
-1.65%
6M
183.94%
YTD
243.32%
1Y
687.66%
3Y*
149.71%
5Y*
66.39%
10Y*
54.18%

SMH

1D
0.54%
1M
0.26%
6M
56.99%
YTD
69.67%
1Y
113.20%
3Y*
59.96%
5Y*
37.42%
10Y*
36.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MU vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
243.32%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-22.84%87.59%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
69.67%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between MU and SMH is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000

0.72

The correlation between MU and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MU vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MU vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.47

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

23.23

7.62

+15.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

83.25

25.13

+58.12

MU vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MU Sharpe Ratio is 9.29, which is higher than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MU and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MU vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.25%

-84.96%

-13.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.28%

-14.93%

-15.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.63%

-35.74%

-21.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.63%

-45.30%

-12.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.63%

-45.30%

-12.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.29%

-8.65%

-10.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.07%

-40.95%

-17.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.43%

4.52%

+3.91%

Volatility

MU vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 33.63% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 18.27%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.63%

18.27%

+15.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.19%

31.01%

+31.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.68%

36.41%

+39.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.75%

36.12%

+18.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.65%

33.10%

+17.55%

Dividends

MU vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than SMH's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


MU and SMH have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (33.63%) compared to SMH (18.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs SMH's -84.96%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.29 vs 3.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MU and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer