MU vs. DRAM
MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
MU vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MU
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 35.46%
- YTD
- 244.07%
- 6M
- 307.41%
- 1Y
- 751.18%
- 3Y*
- 144.69%
- 5Y*
- 66.21%
- 10Y*
- 55.83%
DRAM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 27.22%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MU vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 166.85% |
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 140.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and DRAM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MU vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank
MU
DRAM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MU vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MU | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 24.91 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 94.64 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MU vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -19.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and DRAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MU | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -19.97% | -78.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.07% | -6.74% | -2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.16% | -3.06% | -55.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.95% | — | — |
Volatility
MU vs. DRAM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MU | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.86% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.74% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.66% | 87.02% | -17.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.18% | 87.02% | -33.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.12% | 87.02% | -36.90% |
Dividends
MU vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, MU and DRAM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for MU and DRAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer