MU vs. DGRO
MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Over the past 10 years, MU returned 54.16%/yr vs 13.15%/yr for DGRO. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MU vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 240.34% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has outperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 54.16%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.15% annualized return.
MU
- 1D
- 12.17%
- 1M
- -14.38%
- 6M
- 166.13%
- YTD
- 240.34%
- 1Y
- 758.76%
- 3Y*
- 146.36%
- 5Y*
- 67.49%
- 10Y*
- 54.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.59%
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 1Y
- 21.28%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.15%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.36%
MU vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 240.34% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 11.72% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and DGRO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MU and DGRO has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MU vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
MU
DGRO
MU vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MU | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.41 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 25.31 | 3.30 | +22.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 84.73 | 12.74 | +71.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MU vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MU | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -35.10% | -63.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.28% | -6.47% | -23.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.63% | -14.03% | -43.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | -19.31% | -38.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.63% | -35.10% | -22.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.99% | -0.95% | -19.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.05% | -3.41% | -54.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.03% | 1.67% | +7.36% |
Volatility
MU vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 32.09% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.71%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MU | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.09% | 2.71% | +29.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.69% | 7.14% | +56.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.22% | 9.54% | +67.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.26% | 13.78% | +41.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.92% | 16.58% | +34.34% |
Dividends
MU vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than DGRO's 1.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.92% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MU and DGRO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (32.09%) compared to DGRO (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.93 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MU and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer