MU vs. DARP
MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while DARP (Grizzle Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Grizzle. Over the past year, MU returned 758.76% vs 50.74% for DARP. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MU vs. DARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 240.34% return, which is significantly higher than DARP's 22.65% return.
MU
- 1D
- 12.17%
- 1M
- -14.38%
- 6M
- 166.13%
- YTD
- 240.34%
- 1Y
- 758.76%
- 3Y*
- 146.36%
- 5Y*
- 67.49%
- 10Y*
- 54.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.59%
DARP
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -6.34%
- 6M
- 15.09%
- YTD
- 22.65%
- 1Y
- 50.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 32.89%
MU vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 240.34% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 34.33% |
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF | 22.65% | 40.19% | 24.63% | 6.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and DARP is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2023 | 0.70 |
The correlation between MU and DARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MU vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank
MU
DARP
MU vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MU | DARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.32 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 25.31 | 4.32 | +20.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 84.73 | 14.01 | +70.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MU vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than DARP's maximum drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and DARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MU | DARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -30.27% | -67.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.28% | -11.82% | -18.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.99% | -8.25% | -11.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.05% | -4.65% | -53.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.03% | 3.63% | +5.40% |
Volatility
MU vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 32.09% compared to Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) at 9.95%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MU | DARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.09% | 9.95% | +22.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.69% | 20.22% | +43.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.22% | 25.82% | +51.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.26% | 26.59% | +28.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.92% | 26.59% | +24.33% |
Dividends
MU vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than DARP's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF | 0.35% | 0.43% | 1.93% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MU and DARP have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (32.09%) compared to DARP (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs DARP's -30.27%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.93 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MU and DARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer