MU vs. CCNR
MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while CCNR (ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF) is Natural Resources fund actively managed by ALPS. Over the past year, MU returned 751.18% vs 55.12% for CCNR. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MU vs. CCNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 244.07% return, which is significantly higher than CCNR's 21.92% return.
MU
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 35.46%
- YTD
- 244.07%
- 6M
- 307.41%
- 1Y
- 751.18%
- 3Y*
- 144.69%
- 5Y*
- 66.21%
- 10Y*
- 55.83%
CCNR
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 21.92%
- 6M
- 23.45%
- 1Y
- 55.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MU vs. CCNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 244.07% | 240.24% | -38.14% |
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | 21.92% | 46.48% | -7.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between MU and CCNR is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MU vs. CCNR — Risk / Return Rank
MU
CCNR
MU vs. CCNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MU | CCNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | 1.51 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 24.91 | 7.25 | +17.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 94.64 | 25.70 | +68.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MU vs. CCNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than CCNR's maximum drawdown of -20.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and CCNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MU | CCNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.25% | -20.06% | -78.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.28% | -7.85% | -22.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.07% | -5.21% | -3.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.16% | -3.58% | -54.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.95% | 2.21% | +5.74% |
Volatility
MU vs. CCNR - Volatility Comparison
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 32.86% compared to ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) at 6.78%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MU | CCNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.86% | 6.78% | +26.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.74% | 13.94% | +43.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.66% | 18.66% | +51.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.18% | 20.14% | +33.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.12% | 20.14% | +29.98% |
Dividends
MU vs. CCNR - Dividend Comparison
MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than CCNR's 2.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCNR ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | 2.86% | 3.48% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MU and CCNR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (32.86%) compared to CCNR (6.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs CCNR's -20.06%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.83 vs 3.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MU and CCNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer