MTYY vs. OMAH
MTYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MTYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.
Performance
MTYY vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTYY achieves a -33.22% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's 9.07% return.
MTYY
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- -26.74%
- YTD
- -33.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
OMAH
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 1Y
- 15.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.94K | $41.87K | $72.93K | |
| $23.63M | $19.17M | $17.35M |
MTYY vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MTYY GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF | -33.22% | -55.60% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 9.07% | 1.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTYY and OMAH is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTYY vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank
MTYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OMAH
MTYY vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF (MTYY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTYY | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.26 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTYY vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTYY drawdown since its inception was -70.83%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTYY and OMAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTYY | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.83% | -11.83% | -59.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.35% | -1.63% | -68.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.74% | -1.23% | -52.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.23% | — |
Volatility
MTYY vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTYY | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.18% | 8.52% | +23.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.18% | 12.88% | +19.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.18% | 12.88% | +19.30% |
MTYY vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MTYY vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison
MTYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 241.28%, more than OMAH's 15.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MTYY GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF | 241.28% | 48.98% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 15.08% | 12.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTYY and OMAH have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for MTYY.
MTYY has the higher dividend yield at 241.28%, compared with 15.08% for OMAH.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for MTYY and 0.95% for OMAH.
Find the right allocation for MTYY and OMAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer