MTYY vs. NVDL
MTYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF) and NVDL (GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while NVDL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MTYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NVDL.
Performance
MTYY vs. NVDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTYY achieves a -33.22% return, which is significantly lower than NVDL's 19.13% return.
MTYY
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- -26.74%
- YTD
- -33.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
NVDL
- 1D
- 6.85%
- 1M
- 22.50%
- 6M
- 38.93%
- YTD
- 19.13%
- 1Y
- 19.05%
- 3Y*
- 97.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 146.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.94K | $41.87K | $72.93K | |
| $380.97M | $415.87M | $666.11M |
MTYY vs. NVDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MTYY GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF | -33.22% | -55.60% |
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 19.13% | -3.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTYY and NVDL is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTYY vs. NVDL — Risk / Return Rank
MTYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NVDL
MTYY vs. NVDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF (MTYY) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTYY | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.10 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTYY vs. NVDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTYY drawdown since its inception was -70.83%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDL drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTYY and NVDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTYY | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.83% | -67.55% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -42.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -67.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.35% | -18.75% | -51.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.74% | -17.47% | -36.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.78% | — |
Volatility
MTYY vs. NVDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTYY | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 25.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 56.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.18% | 72.65% | -40.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.18% | 90.01% | -57.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.18% | 90.01% | -57.83% |
MTYY vs. NVDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDL's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
MTYY vs. NVDL - Dividend Comparison
MTYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 241.28%, while NVDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MTYY GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF | 241.28% | 48.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTYY and NVDL have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDL is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDL is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for MTYY.
MTYY has the higher dividend yield at 241.28%, compared with 0.00% for NVDL.
MTYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while NVDL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for MTYY and 1.05% for NVDL.
Find the right allocation for MTYY and NVDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer