MTYY vs. FTQI
MTYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF) and FTQI (First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while FTQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. MTYY is actively managed, while FTQI is passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MTYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FTQI.
Performance
MTYY vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTYY achieves a -31.48% return, which is significantly lower than FTQI's 10.72% return.
MTYY
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -12.36%
- YTD
- -31.48%
- 6M
- -34.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTQI
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 9.88%
- 1Y
- 27.20%
- 3Y*
- 16.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.03%
- 10Y*
- 8.16%
MTYY vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MTYY GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF | -31.48% | -55.60% |
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 10.72% | 4.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTYY and FTQI is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTYY vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank
MTYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTQI
MTYY vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF (MTYY) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTYY | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.49 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.38 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 20.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTYY vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTYY drawdown since its inception was -69.58%, which is greater than FTQI's maximum drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTYY and FTQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTYY | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.58% | -19.42% | -50.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.58% | -0.90% | -68.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.09% | -3.74% | -47.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.31% | — |
Volatility
MTYY vs. FTQI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTYY | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.87% | 10.67% | +23.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.87% | 14.83% | +19.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.87% | 13.33% | +20.54% |
MTYY vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MTYY vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison
MTYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 210.32%, more than FTQI's 10.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 10.97% | 11.46% | 11.66% | 11.49% | 9.85% | 3.05% | 3.27% | 2.95% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 3.02% | 3.54% |
MTYY GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF | 210.32% | 48.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTYY and FTQI have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTQI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTQI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for MTYY.
MTYY has the higher dividend yield at 210.32%, compared with 10.97% for FTQI.
MTYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while FTQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for MTYY and 0.75% for FTQI.
Find the right allocation for MTYY and FTQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer