PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTUM vs. UPRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MTUM vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 29.72% return, which is significantly higher than UPRO's 20.70% return. Over the past 10 years, MTUM has underperformed UPRO with an annualized return of 17.15%, while UPRO has yielded a comparatively higher 29.76% annualized return.


MTUM

1D
1.69%
1M
8.76%
YTD
29.72%
6M
30.51%
1Y
42.02%
3Y*
33.16%
5Y*
14.96%
10Y*
17.15%

UPRO

1D
1.54%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
20.70%
6M
21.09%
1Y
70.79%
3Y*
46.83%
5Y*
21.40%
10Y*
29.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTUM vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
29.72%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
20.70%31.88%63.57%68.53%-56.84%98.64%10.09%102.30%-25.11%71.37%

Correlation

The correlation between MTUM and UPRO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.86

The correlation between MTUM and UPRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

MTUM vs. UPRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MTUM
UPRO

Technology

50.2%
39.1%

Industrials

15.0%
7.8%

Energy

10.5%
3.1%

Communication Services

5.1%
10.6%

Financial Services

5.0%
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
4.5%

Healthcare

3.5%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
9.9%

Basic Materials

2.3%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.8%

Utilities

0.6%
2.1%

Technology

MTUM
50.2%
UPRO
39.1%

Industrials

MTUM
15.0%
UPRO
7.8%

Energy

MTUM
10.5%
UPRO
3.1%

Communication Services

MTUM
5.1%
UPRO
10.6%

Financial Services

MTUM
5.0%
UPRO
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

MTUM
3.7%
UPRO
4.5%

Healthcare

MTUM
3.5%
UPRO
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MTUM
2.9%
UPRO
9.9%

Basic Materials

MTUM
2.3%
UPRO
1.7%

Real Estate

MTUM
1.3%
UPRO
1.8%

Utilities

MTUM
0.6%
UPRO
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTUM vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

UPRO
UPRO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
UPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
UPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTUM vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTUMUPRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.30

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

2.43

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.66

10.01

+3.64

MTUM vs. UPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTUM Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the UPRO Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTUM and UPRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTUM vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, smaller than the maximum UPRO drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and UPRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTUMUPRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.08%

-76.82%

+42.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

-26.78%

+15.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

-48.87%

+27.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

-63.94%

+31.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

-76.82%

+42.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-7.60%

+6.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.20%

-14.40%

+8.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

6.50%

-3.51%

Volatility

MTUM vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) is 10.89%, while ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) has a volatility of 13.22%. This indicates that MTUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTUMUPRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.89%

13.22%

-2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.63%

28.74%

-10.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.87%

36.77%

-15.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.94%

50.52%

-29.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

53.83%

-32.63%

MTUM vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTUM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UPRO's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

MTUM vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison

MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than UPRO's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.61%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
0.72%0.84%0.93%0.74%0.52%0.06%0.11%0.41%0.63%0.00%0.12%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


MTUM and UPRO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UPRO has higher volatility (13.22%) compared to MTUM (10.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs UPRO's -76.82%.

On 10-year performance, UPRO leads with 29.76% vs 17.15% for MTUM. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MTUM has been the lower-risk option at 10.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UPRO has performed better with a 29.76% return vs 17.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for UPRO.

UPRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.61% for MTUM.

MTUM is categorized as Momentum, while UPRO is Leveraged Equities. MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while UPRO tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTUM and 0.89% for UPRO.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTUM and UPRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer