MTUM vs. TQQQ
MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MTUM returned 17.54%/yr vs 46.35%/yr for TQQQ. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MTUM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.
Performance
MTUM vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 33.55% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 60.72% return. Over the past 10 years, MTUM has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 17.54%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 46.35% annualized return.
MTUM
- 1D
- 2.96%
- 1M
- 11.98%
- YTD
- 33.55%
- 6M
- 34.98%
- 1Y
- 46.22%
- 3Y*
- 33.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.90%
- 10Y*
- 17.54%
TQQQ
- 1D
- 9.12%
- 1M
- 12.28%
- YTD
- 60.72%
- 6M
- 63.13%
- 1Y
- 133.92%
- 3Y*
- 62.54%
- 5Y*
- 26.58%
- 10Y*
- 46.35%
MTUM vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 33.55% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 37.50% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 60.72% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTUM and TQQQ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.85 |
The correlation between MTUM and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
MTUM vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MTUM
TQQQ
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
MTUM
TQQQ
Industrials
MTUM
TQQQ
Energy
MTUM
TQQQ
Communication Services
MTUM
TQQQ
Financial Services
MTUM
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
MTUM
TQQQ
Healthcare
MTUM
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
MTUM
TQQQ
Basic Materials
MTUM
TQQQ
Real Estate
MTUM
TQQQ
Utilities
MTUM
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTUM vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
MTUM
TQQQ
MTUM vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTUM | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.38 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.02 | 3.64 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.48 | 11.67 | +3.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTUM vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTUM | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.08% | -81.66% | +47.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.54% | -36.97% | +25.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.99% | -58.04% | +37.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.28% | -81.66% | +49.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.08% | -81.66% | +47.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.02% | +3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -18.51% | +12.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 11.52% | -8.53% |
Volatility
MTUM vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) is 11.20%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 24.33%. This indicates that MTUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTUM | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.20% | 24.33% | -13.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.83% | 42.10% | -23.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.08% | 51.92% | -30.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.99% | 67.15% | -46.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 66.30% | -45.07% |
MTUM vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTUM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MTUM vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than TQQQ's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.70% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.37% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTUM and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (24.33%) compared to MTUM (11.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 46.35% vs 17.54% for MTUM. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MTUM has been the lower-risk option at 11.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 46.35% return vs 17.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.
MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.37% for TQQQ.
MTUM is categorized as Momentum, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTUM and 0.95% for TQQQ.
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTUM and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer