PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MTUM vs. SCHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MTUM vs. SCHP

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MTUM returned 17.15%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for SCHP. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MTUM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.

Performance

MTUM vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 29.72% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, MTUM has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 17.15%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.60% annualized return.

MTUM

1D
1.69%
1M
5.58%
YTD
29.72%
6M
30.51%
1Y
42.02%
3Y*
33.16%
5Y*
14.96%
10Y*
17.15%

SCHP

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.48%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
4.14%
5Y*
1.06%
10Y*
2.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTUM vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF		29.72%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF		1.42%6.76%1.95%3.91%-12.02%5.87%10.86%8.52%-1.78%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between MTUM and SCHP is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.00

The correlation between MTUM and SCHP shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MTUM vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MTUM
SCHP

Technology

44.4%

-

Industrials

15.6%

-

Financial Services

10.4%
0.0%

Communication Services

7.4%

-

Healthcare

6.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.6%
100.0%

Energy

3.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.3%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Utilities

1.6%

-

Technology

MTUM
44.4%
SCHP

-

Industrials

MTUM
15.6%
SCHP

-

Financial Services

MTUM
10.4%
SCHP
0.0%

Communication Services

MTUM
7.4%
SCHP

-

Healthcare

MTUM
6.9%
SCHP

-

Consumer Cyclical

MTUM
3.6%
SCHP
100.0%

Energy

MTUM
3.5%
SCHP

-

Consumer Defensive

MTUM
3.3%
SCHP

-

Real Estate

MTUM
1.8%
SCHP

-

Basic Materials

MTUM
1.7%
SCHP

-

Utilities

MTUM
1.6%
SCHP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF

Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF

Often compared with MTUM:
MTUM vs. SPMOMTUM vs. SPYMTUM vs. QQQMTUM vs. QUALMTUM vs. VOOMTUM vs. VFMOMTUM vs. QMOM
Often compared with SCHP:
SCHP vs. VTIPSCHP vs. TIPSCHP vs. SCHZSCHP vs. FIPDXSCHP vs. STIPSCHP vs. SCHDSCHP vs. BND

Return for Risk

MTUM vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
SCHP
SCHP Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTUM vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MTUMSCHPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.96
1.44

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.62
2.19

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.25

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

2.45

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.66

7.41

+6.25

MTUM vs. SCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTUM Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the SCHP Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTUM and SCHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTUM vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and SCHP.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MTUMSCHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.08%

-14.26%

-19.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

-1.93%

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

-4.48%

-16.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

-14.26%

-18.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

-14.26%

-19.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-0.44%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.20%

-3.93%

-2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

0.64%

+2.35%

Volatility

MTUM vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a higher volatility of 10.89% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.02%. This indicates that MTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MTUMSCHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.89%

1.02%

+9.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.63%

2.24%

+16.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.87%

3.30%

+17.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.94%

6.12%

+14.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

5.59%

+15.61%

MTUM vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTUM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MTUM vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison

MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than SCHP's 3.99% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF		0.61%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF		3.99%4.06%2.99%3.02%7.19%4.39%1.11%2.02%2.26%1.90%1.38%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

MTUM and SCHP have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (10.89%) compared to SCHP (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs SCHP's -14.26%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.15% vs 2.60% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.15% return vs 2.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.

SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 0.61% for MTUM.

MTUM is categorized as Momentum, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTUM and 0.03% for SCHP.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTUM and SCHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer