MTUM vs. SCHD
MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MTUM returned 15.78%/yr vs 12.70%/yr for SCHD. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MTUM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
MTUM vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 20.80% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MTUM has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 15.78%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.70% annualized return.
MTUM
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- 6M
- 17.04%
- YTD
- 20.80%
- 1Y
- 27.28%
- 3Y*
- 28.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.67%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- 6M
- 13.71%
- YTD
- 24.36%
- 1Y
- 31.89%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 9.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $578.91M | $630.18M | $548.65M | |
| $806.58M | $724.91M | $690.35M |
MTUM vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 20.80% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 37.50% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 24.36% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTUM and SCHD is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MTUM and SCHD has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MTUM vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MTUM
SCHD
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
MTUM
SCHD
Industrials
MTUM
SCHD
Energy
MTUM
SCHD
Financial Services
MTUM
SCHD
Communication Services
MTUM
SCHD
Healthcare
MTUM
SCHD
Utilities
MTUM
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
MTUM
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
MTUM
SCHD
Basic Materials
MTUM
SCHD
Real Estate
MTUM
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTUM vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
MTUM
SCHD
MTUM vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTUM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.52 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 6.94 | -5.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.14 | 17.53 | -11.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTUM vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTUM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.08% | -33.37% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.99% | -4.61% | -13.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.99% | -16.13% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.28% | -16.85% | -15.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.08% | -33.37% | -0.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.58% | -0.97% | -11.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.22% | -3.29% | -2.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 1.82% | +2.64% |
Volatility
MTUM vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a higher volatility of 10.76% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.82%. This indicates that MTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTUM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.76% | 3.82% | +6.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.24% | 7.99% | +15.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.57% | 11.06% | +14.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 14.39% | +7.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 16.73% | +5.00% |
MTUM vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTUM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MTUM vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than SCHD's 3.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.61% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.12% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTUM and SCHD have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (10.76%) compared to SCHD (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 15.78% vs 12.70% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 15.78% return vs 12.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 0.61% for MTUM.
MTUM is categorized as Momentum, while SCHD is Dividend. MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTUM and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTUM and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer