MTUM vs. PSP
MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) and PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while PSP is a Global Equities fund tracking the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MTUM returned 17.54%/yr vs 8.12%/yr for PSP. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MTUM charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.44%/yr for PSP.
Performance
MTUM vs. PSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 33.55% return, which is significantly higher than PSP's -11.42% return. Over the past 10 years, MTUM has outperformed PSP with an annualized return of 17.54%, while PSP has yielded a comparatively lower 8.12% annualized return.
MTUM
- 1D
- 2.96%
- 1M
- 11.98%
- YTD
- 33.55%
- 6M
- 34.98%
- 1Y
- 46.22%
- 3Y*
- 33.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.90%
- 10Y*
- 17.54%
PSP
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- -11.42%
- 6M
- -10.38%
- 1Y
- -5.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.76%
- 5Y*
- 0.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.12%
MTUM vs. PSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 33.55% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 37.50% |
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -11.42% | 6.49% | 17.42% | 37.72% | -37.37% | 27.30% | 12.47% | 35.73% | -15.12% | 24.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTUM and PSP is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.66 |
The correlation between MTUM and PSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
MTUM vs. PSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MTUM
PSP
Technology
Industrials
Energy
-
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
MTUM
PSP
Industrials
MTUM
PSP
Energy
MTUM
PSP
-
Communication Services
MTUM
PSP
Financial Services
MTUM
PSP
Consumer Defensive
MTUM
PSP
Healthcare
MTUM
PSP
Consumer Cyclical
MTUM
PSP
-
Basic Materials
MTUM
PSP
Real Estate
MTUM
PSP
-
Utilities
MTUM
PSP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTUM vs. PSP — Risk / Return Rank
MTUM
PSP
MTUM vs. PSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTUM | PSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 0.97 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.02 | -0.24 | +4.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.48 | -0.54 | +16.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTUM vs. PSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, smaller than the maximum PSP drawdown of -85.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and PSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTUM | PSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.08% | -85.40% | +51.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.54% | -22.37% | +10.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.99% | -22.94% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.28% | -47.16% | +14.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.08% | -47.16% | +13.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -15.75% | +15.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -30.67% | +24.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 10.12% | -7.13% |
Volatility
MTUM vs. PSP - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a higher volatility of 11.20% compared to Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) at 7.43%. This indicates that MTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTUM | PSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.20% | 7.43% | +3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.83% | 16.48% | +2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.08% | 20.15% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.99% | 23.85% | -2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 22.47% | -1.24% |
MTUM vs. PSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTUM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PSP's 1.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
MTUM vs. PSP - Dividend Comparison
MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than PSP's 6.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.70% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 6.52% | 5.87% | 8.62% | 3.96% | 2.88% | 10.34% | 4.66% | 5.87% | 6.81% | 10.18% | 4.12% | 6.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTUM and PSP have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (11.20%) compared to PSP (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs PSP's -85.40%.
On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.54% vs 8.12% for PSP. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PSP has been the lower-risk option at 7.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.54% return vs 8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.
PSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.52%, compared with 0.70% for MTUM.
MTUM is categorized as Momentum, while PSP is Global Equities. MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while PSP tracks Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTUM and 1.44% for PSP.
MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTUM and PSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer