MTUM vs. PSL
MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) and PSL (Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index while PSL tracks the DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MTUM returned 16.47%/yr vs 7.94%/yr for PSL. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MTUM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PSL.
Performance
MTUM vs. PSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 22.55% return, which is significantly higher than PSL's 10.07% return. Over the past 10 years, MTUM has outperformed PSL with an annualized return of 16.47%, while PSL has yielded a comparatively lower 7.94% annualized return.
MTUM
- 1D
- -5.95%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 22.55%
- 6M
- 21.67%
- 1Y
- 33.50%
- 3Y*
- 31.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.56%
- 10Y*
- 16.47%
PSL
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- 10.07%
- 6M
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- 1.26%
- 3Y*
- 9.70%
- 5Y*
- 3.87%
- 10Y*
- 7.94%
MTUM vs. PSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 22.55% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 37.50% |
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 10.07% | -3.47% | 15.42% | 12.32% | -7.76% | 6.88% | 18.15% | 14.16% | 0.92% | 21.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTUM and PSL is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2013 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MTUM and PSL has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MTUM vs. PSL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MTUM
PSL
Technology
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
MTUM
PSL
-
Industrials
MTUM
PSL
Financial Services
MTUM
PSL
Communication Services
MTUM
PSL
-
Healthcare
MTUM
PSL
-
Consumer Cyclical
MTUM
PSL
Energy
MTUM
PSL
-
Consumer Defensive
MTUM
PSL
Real Estate
MTUM
PSL
-
Basic Materials
MTUM
PSL
-
Utilities
MTUM
PSL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTUM vs. PSL — Risk / Return Rank
MTUM
PSL
MTUM vs. PSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MTUM | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.03 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 0.09 | +2.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.51 | 0.21 | +11.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MTUM | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | 0.10 | +1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.26 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.48 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.55 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
MTUM vs. PSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, smaller than the maximum PSL drawdown of -41.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and PSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTUM | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.08% | -41.58% | +7.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.54% | -13.64% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.99% | -13.64% | -7.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.28% | -22.35% | -9.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.08% | -34.67% | +0.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.99% | -5.58% | -1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -5.82% | -0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 6.11% | -3.19% |
Volatility
MTUM vs. PSL - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a higher volatility of 9.83% compared to Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) at 3.16%. This indicates that MTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTUM | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.83% | 3.16% | +6.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.69% | 8.55% | +9.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.03% | 12.79% | +7.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 15.15% | +5.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.12% | 16.50% | +4.62% |
MTUM vs. PSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MTUM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PSL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
MTUM vs. PSL - Dividend Comparison
MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than PSL's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.64% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 1.98% | 1.24% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 2.08% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTUM and PSL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (9.83%) compared to PSL (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs PSL's -41.58%.
On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 16.47% vs 7.94% for PSL. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PSL has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 16.47% return vs 7.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSL.
PSL has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.64% for MTUM.
MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while PSL tracks DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTUM and 0.60% for PSL.
MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTUM and PSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer