PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTUM vs. MMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MTUM vs. MMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTUM achieves a 31.46% return, which is significantly higher than MMTM's 4.97% return. Over the past 10 years, MTUM has outperformed MMTM with an annualized return of 17.44%, while MMTM has yielded a comparatively lower 14.79% annualized return.


MTUM

1D
-0.41%
1M
8.29%
YTD
31.46%
6M
28.81%
1Y
39.62%
3Y*
33.68%
5Y*
15.03%
10Y*
17.44%

MMTM

1D
-0.28%
1M
-4.10%
YTD
4.97%
6M
3.38%
1Y
17.53%
3Y*
20.21%
5Y*
12.37%
10Y*
14.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTUM vs. MMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
31.46%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
4.97%13.26%29.94%22.49%-16.12%26.33%19.27%29.98%-4.62%24.41%

Correlation

The correlation between MTUM and MMTM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.77

The correlation between MTUM and MMTM shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MTUM vs. MMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MTUM
MMTM

Technology

50.2%
32.3%

Industrials

15.0%
7.3%

Energy

10.5%
1.6%

Communication Services

5.1%
7.4%

Financial Services

5.0%
15.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
6.2%

Healthcare

3.5%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
12.1%

Basic Materials

2.3%
1.9%

Real Estate

1.3%
3.0%

Utilities

0.6%
2.4%

Technology

MTUM
50.2%
MMTM
32.3%

Industrials

MTUM
15.0%
MMTM
7.3%

Energy

MTUM
10.5%
MMTM
1.6%

Communication Services

MTUM
5.1%
MMTM
7.4%

Financial Services

MTUM
5.0%
MMTM
15.1%

Consumer Defensive

MTUM
3.7%
MMTM
6.2%

Healthcare

MTUM
3.5%
MMTM
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MTUM
2.9%
MMTM
12.1%

Basic Materials

MTUM
2.3%
MMTM
1.9%

Real Estate

MTUM
1.3%
MMTM
3.0%

Utilities

MTUM
0.6%
MMTM
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTUM vs. MMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

MMTM
MMTM Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
MMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTUM vs. MMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTUMMMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.22

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

1.78

+1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.13

7.69

+5.43

MTUM vs. MMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTUM Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the MMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTUM and MMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTUM vs. MMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUM drawdown since its inception was -34.08%, roughly equal to the maximum MMTM drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUM and MMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTUMMMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.08%

-33.85%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

-9.89%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.99%

-22.08%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

-23.72%

-8.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

-33.85%

-0.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.87%

-5.25%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-4.19%

-2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

2.28%

+0.75%

Volatility

MTUM vs. MMTM - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a higher volatility of 12.23% compared to SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) at 4.08%. This indicates that MTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTUMMMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.23%

4.08%

+8.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.36%

10.91%

+8.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.89%

14.52%

+7.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.15%

18.26%

+2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.31%

18.66%

+2.65%

MTUM vs. MMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTUM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than MMTM's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MTUM vs. MMTM - Dividend Comparison

MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than MMTM's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
0.89%0.86%0.83%1.16%1.67%0.95%1.14%1.55%1.64%1.52%1.98%1.68%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.56%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


MTUM and MMTM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (12.23%) compared to MMTM (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTUM dropped -34.08% vs MMTM's -33.85%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.44% vs 14.79% for MMTM. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.44% return vs 14.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.

MMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.56% for MTUM.

MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, while MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MTUM and 0.12% for MMTM.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTUM and MMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer