PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTSI vs. CRDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MTSI vs. CRDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTSI achieves a 121.78% return, which is significantly higher than CRDO's 74.31% return.


MTSI

1D
1.36%
1M
-0.44%
YTD
121.78%
6M
114.19%
1Y
187.15%
3Y*
82.85%
5Y*
44.69%
10Y*
26.08%

CRDO

1D
-5.27%
1M
32.45%
YTD
74.31%
6M
74.28%
1Y
237.38%
3Y*
142.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTSI vs. CRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
121.78%31.85%39.76%47.59%-0.14%
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
74.31%114.09%245.20%46.28%10.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MTSI and CRDO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022

0.56

The correlation between MTSI and CRDO shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MTSI:

$29.30B

CRDO:

$48.33B

EPS

MTSI:

$2.33

CRDO:

$2.50

PE Ratio

MTSI:

163.18

CRDO:

100.50

PEG Ratio

MTSI:

0.24

CRDO:

0.09

PS Ratio

MTSI:

26.86

CRDO:

35.55

PB Ratio

MTSI:

20.67

CRDO:

23.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

MTSI:

$1.07B

CRDO:

$1.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MTSI:

$594.25M

CRDO:

$908.35M

EBITDA (TTM)

MTSI:

$245.21M

CRDO:

$463.79M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTSI vs. CRDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTSI
MTSI Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
MTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
MTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDO
CRDO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CRDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTSI vs. CRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTSICRDODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.35

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.54

4.46

+5.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.62

10.76

+13.86

MTSI vs. CRDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTSI Sharpe Ratio is 3.70, which is higher than the CRDO Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTSI and CRDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTSI vs. CRDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTSI drawdown since its inception was -80.78%, which is greater than CRDO's maximum drawdown of -62.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTSI and CRDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTSICRDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.78%

-62.04%

-18.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.74%

-53.59%

+33.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.09%

-61.05%

+19.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.28%

-5.27%

-2.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.20%

-19.38%

-6.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.64%

22.17%

-14.53%

Volatility

MTSI vs. CRDO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) is 20.31%, while Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a volatility of 28.41%. This indicates that MTSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTSICRDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.31%

28.41%

-8.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.72%

65.16%

-24.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.86%

85.70%

-34.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.70%

81.50%

-37.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.43%

81.50%

-29.07%

Dividends

MTSI vs. CRDO - Dividend Comparison

Neither MTSI nor CRDO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

MTSI vs. CRDO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
288.96M
437.00M
(MTSI) Total Revenue
(CRDO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MTSI vs. CRDO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
56.9%
68.2%
Portfolio components
MTSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 164.43M and revenue of 288.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.9%.

CRDO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.

MTSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.83M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

CRDO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.

MTSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 46.33M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.

CRDO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MTSI and CRDO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRDO has higher volatility (28.41%) compared to MTSI (20.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTSI dropped -80.78% vs CRDO's -62.04%.

MTSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTSI and CRDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer