MTRX vs. NUKZ
MTRX (Matrix Service Company) is a stock, while NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. Over the past year, MTRX returned -18.65% vs 9.75% for NUKZ. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MTRX vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTRX achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly lower than NUKZ's 0.28% return.
MTRX
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- 6M
- -18.99%
- YTD
- -0.85%
- 1Y
- -18.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.23%
- 10Y*
- -3.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.12%
NUKZ
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -4.27%
- 6M
- -8.28%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 1Y
- 9.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 44.25%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.21M | $2.36M | $3.29M | |
| $6.06M | $6.01M | $8.30M |
MTRX vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MTRX Matrix Service Company | -0.85% | -2.26% | 26.13% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.28% | 56.57% | 60.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTRX and NUKZ is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024 | 0.46 |
The correlation between MTRX and NUKZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTRX vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank
MTRX
NUKZ
MTRX vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matrix Service Company (MTRX) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTRX | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.06 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | 0.33 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.17 | 0.80 | -1.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTRX vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTRX drawdown since its inception was -90.70%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTRX and NUKZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTRX | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.70% | -33.03% | -57.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.71% | -20.29% | -15.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.83% | -16.46% | -52.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.01% | -6.44% | -53.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.66% | 8.42% | +12.24% |
Volatility
MTRX vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison
Matrix Service Company (MTRX) has a higher volatility of 13.67% compared to Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) at 9.21%. This indicates that MTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTRX | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.67% | 9.21% | +4.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.87% | 23.79% | +11.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.53% | 31.03% | +17.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.22% | 32.74% | +21.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.38% | 32.74% | +22.64% |
Dividends
MTRX vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison
MTRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MTRX Matrix Service Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.91% | 0.91% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MTRX and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTRX has higher volatility (13.67%) compared to NUKZ (9.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTRX dropped -90.70% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.
NUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MTRX and NUKZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer