MTRX.TO vs. SIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MTRX.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MTRX.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Mirae Asset AI Infrastructure CAD Index, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MTRX.TO returned 86.01% vs 93.70% for SIL. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MTRX.TO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.

Performance

MTRX.TO vs. SIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MTRX.TO is traded in CAD, while SIL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SIL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTRX.TO achieves a 39.15% return, which is significantly higher than SIL's 6.09% return.

MTRX.TO

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 7.93%
• YTD: 39.15%
• 6M: 40.85%
• 1Y: 86.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SIL

• 1D: -4.57%
• 1M: 2.69%
• YTD: 6.09%
• 6M: 15.21%
• 1Y: 93.70%
• 3Y*: 50.88%
• 5Y*: 17.22%
• 10Y*: 11.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTRX.TO vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MTRX.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF	39.15%	37.29%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	6.09%	120.79%

Correlation

The correlation between MTRX.TO and SIL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025	0.37

Return for Risk

MTRX.TO vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTRX.TO

MTRX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 85
MTRX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MTRX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
MTRX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
MTRX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
MTRX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 89

SIL

SIL Risk / Return Rank: 48
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 46
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTRX.TO vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MTRX.TO	SIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.96	1.93	+1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.62	2.26	+1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.31	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.85	2.90	+2.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.13	7.50	+12.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MTRX.TO vs. SIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTRX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is higher than the SIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTRX.TO and SIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MTRX.TO	SIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.96	1.93	+1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.08	0.20	+1.87

Drawdowns

MTRX.TO vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTRX.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.75%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -74.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTRX.TO and SIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTRX.TO	SIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.75%	-74.25%	+54.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.79%	-32.51%	+17.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-32.51%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-49.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-60.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	-24.47%	+23.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.05%	-40.76%	+36.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.29%	12.54%	-8.25%

Volatility

MTRX.TO vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF (MTRX.TO) is 9.59%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 17.44%. This indicates that MTRX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTRX.TO	SIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.59%	17.44%	-7.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.57%	40.38%	-16.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.18%	48.74%	-19.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.82%	36.60%	-4.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.82%	37.42%	-5.60%

MTRX.TO vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTRX.TO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

MTRX.TO vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison

MTRX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than SIL's 1.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MTRX.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Index ETF	0.03%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	1.13%	1.18%	2.40%	0.59%	0.48%	1.59%	1.92%	1.53%	1.21%	0.02%	3.34%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTRX.TO and SIL in my portfolio?

MTRX.TO and SIL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MTRX.TO or SIL?

On fees, MTRX.TO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MTRX.TO or SIL?

MTRX.TO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.

What is the main difference between MTRX.TO and SIL?

MTRX.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while SIL is Silver. MTRX.TO tracks Mirae Asset AI Infrastructure CAD Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MTRX.TO and 0.65% for SIL.