MTRA vs. XIDV

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MTRA (Invesco International Growth Focus ETF) and XIDV (Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. MTRA is actively managed, while XIDV is passively managed. Over the past year, MTRA returned 9.61% vs 33.32% for XIDV. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MTRA charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XIDV.

Performance

MTRA vs. XIDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) and Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTRA achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than XIDV's 18.56% return.

MTRA

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -1.71%
• 6M: -1.48%
• YTD: 1.23%
• 1Y: 9.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.78%

XIDV

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: 5.79%
• 6M: 13.58%
• YTD: 18.56%
• 1Y: 33.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 40.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MTRA Invesco International Growth Focus ETF	$230.43K	$226.21K	$171.07K
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF	$193.03K	$150.10K	$420.16K

MTRA vs. XIDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MTRA Invesco International Growth Focus ETF	1.23%	4.16%
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF	18.56%	15.10%

Correlation

The correlation between MTRA and XIDV is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025	0.68

The correlation between MTRA and XIDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MTRA vs. XIDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MTRA

MTRA Risk / Return Rank: 21
MTRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MTRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
MTRA Omega Ratio Rank: 20
MTRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
MTRA Martin Ratio Rank: 22

XIDV

XIDV Risk / Return Rank: 93
XIDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
XIDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
XIDV Omega Ratio Rank: 93
XIDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
XIDV Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MTRA vs. XIDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) and Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MTRA	XIDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	2.69	-2.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.72	3.67	-2.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.49	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	4.09	-3.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.53	14.58	-13.05

MTRA vs. XIDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTRA Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the XIDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTRA and XIDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MTRA vs. XIDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTRA drawdown since its inception was -15.77%, which is greater than XIDV's maximum drawdown of -12.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTRA and XIDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTRA	XIDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.77%	-12.15%	-3.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.77%	-8.25%	-7.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.24%	-0.81%	-3.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.82%	-1.38%	-2.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.32%	2.31%	+3.01%

Volatility

MTRA vs. XIDV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) at 3.54%. This indicates that MTRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTRA	XIDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.07%	3.54%	+2.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.75%	10.51%	+6.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.14%	12.57%	+6.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.58%	14.58%	+4.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.58%	14.58%	+4.00%

MTRA vs. XIDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTRA has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than XIDV's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

MTRA vs. XIDV - Dividend Comparison

MTRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than XIDV's 5.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
MTRA Invesco International Growth Focus ETF	0.68%	0.69%
XIDV Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF	5.75%	4.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTRA and XIDV in my portfolio?

MTRA and XIDV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MTRA or XIDV?

MTRA has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to XIDV (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTRA dropped -15.77% vs XIDV's -12.15%.

Which ETF is better, MTRA or XIDV?

On 1-year performance, XIDV leads with 33.32% vs 9.61% for MTRA. On fees, XIDV is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XIDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MTRA or XIDV?

Over the 1-year period, XIDV has performed better with a 33.32% return vs 9.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MTRA or XIDV?

XIDV is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for MTRA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MTRA or XIDV?

XIDV has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 0.68% for MTRA.

What is the main difference between MTRA and XIDV?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for MTRA and 0.19% for XIDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XIDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.