MTRA vs. MCSE

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MTRA (Invesco International Growth Focus ETF) and MCSE (Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MTRA returned 9.61% vs 4.30% for MCSE. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MTRA charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MCSE.

Performance

MTRA vs. MCSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) and Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTRA achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly higher than MCSE's 1.12% return.

MTRA

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -1.71%
• 6M: -1.48%
• YTD: 1.23%
• 1Y: 9.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.78%

MCSE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.12%
• 1Y: 4.30%
• 3Y*: -0.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MTRA Invesco International Growth Focus ETF	$230.43K	$226.21K	$171.07K

MTRA vs. MCSE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MTRA Invesco International Growth Focus ETF	1.23%	4.16%
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	1.12%	-2.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MTRA and MCSE is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025	0.50

The correlation between MTRA and MCSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MTRA vs. MCSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MTRA

MTRA Risk / Return Rank: 21
MTRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MTRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
MTRA Omega Ratio Rank: 20
MTRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
MTRA Martin Ratio Rank: 22

MCSE

MCSE Risk / Return Rank: 19
MCSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
MCSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
MCSE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
MCSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
MCSE Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MTRA vs. MCSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) and Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MTRA	MCSE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	0.37	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.72	0.58	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.10	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	0.37	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.53	0.92	+0.61

MTRA vs. MCSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTRA Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is comparable to the MCSE Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTRA and MCSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MTRA vs. MCSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTRA drawdown since its inception was -15.77%, smaller than the maximum MCSE drawdown of -26.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTRA and MCSE.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTRA	MCSE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.77%	-26.36%	+10.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.77%	-10.42%	-5.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.24%	-10.51%	+6.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.82%	-8.79%	+4.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.32%	4.36%	+0.96%

Volatility

MTRA vs. MCSE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco International Growth Focus ETF (MTRA) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) at 0.00%. This indicates that MTRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTRA	MCSE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.07%	0.00%	+6.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.75%	1.91%	+14.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.14%	10.71%	+8.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.58%	19.08%	-0.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.58%	19.08%	-0.50%

MTRA vs. MCSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTRA has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than MCSE's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

MTRA vs. MCSE - Dividend Comparison

MTRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than MCSE's 3.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	3.74%	3.78%	0.63%	0.57%	0.48%
MTRA Invesco International Growth Focus ETF	0.68%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTRA and MCSE in my portfolio?

MTRA and MCSE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MTRA or MCSE?

MTRA has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to MCSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTRA dropped -15.77% vs MCSE's -26.36%.

Which ETF is better, MTRA or MCSE?

On 1-year performance, MTRA leads with 9.61% vs 4.30% for MCSE. On fees, MTRA is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, MCSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MTRA or MCSE?

Over the 1-year period, MTRA has performed better with a 9.61% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MTRA or MCSE?

MTRA is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MCSE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MTRA or MCSE?

MCSE has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 0.68% for MTRA.

What is the main difference between MTRA and MCSE?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for MTRA and 0.59% for MCSE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MTRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.