PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTGP vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MTGP vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund (MTGP) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTGP achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 8.57% return.


MTGP

1D
-0.36%
1M
-0.90%
6M
-0.62%
YTD
-0.08%
1Y
3.04%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
0.10%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.87%

DGRW

1D
0.49%
1M
0.69%
6M
6.01%
YTD
8.57%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
11.41%
10Y*
13.71%
ALL TIME*
12.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$51.03M$48.50M$56.54M
$422.32K$672.43K$425.74K

MTGP vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MTGP
WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund
-0.08%7.57%2.48%3.96%-11.29%-0.64%4.91%0.08%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
8.57%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MTGP and DGRW is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2019

0.06

Over the past year, MTGP and DGRW have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTGP vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MTGP
MTGP Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
MTGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTGP Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MTGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTGP Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MTGP vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund (MTGP) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MTGPDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.26

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

1.79

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.02

7.25

-3.22

MTGP vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTGP Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTGP and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MTGP vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTGP drawdown since its inception was -16.63%, smaller than the maximum DGRW drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTGP and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTGPDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.63%

-32.04%

+15.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.53%

-8.30%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.52%

-16.21%

+10.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.63%

-17.27%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-1.31%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-3.00%

-2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

2.05%

-1.07%

Volatility

MTGP vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund (MTGP) is 1.38%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that MTGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTGPDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

2.92%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.17%

8.33%

-5.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.29%

10.44%

-6.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.83%

14.01%

-8.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.23%

16.18%

-10.95%

MTGP vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTGP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

MTGP vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

MTGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than DGRW's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.28%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
MTGP
WisdomTree Mortgage Plus Bond Fund
4.42%4.19%4.05%3.02%2.47%1.64%2.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MTGP and DGRW have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRW has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to MTGP (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTGP dropped -16.63% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 5-year performance, DGRW leads with 11.41% vs 0.10% for MTGP. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, MTGP has been the lower-risk option at 1.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 11.41% return vs 0.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MTGP.

MTGP has the higher dividend yield at 4.42%, compared with 1.28% for DGRW.

MTGP is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while DGRW is Quality Factor. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MTGP and 0.28% for DGRW.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTGP and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer